| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
10 members (Samantha, Bill Hanlon, 55shaker, 1955 1 Series, cmayna, Otto Skorzeny, Stelonlevo, JW51, treegrower, 1 invisible),
133
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,071 Posts1,055,901 Members48,429 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 236 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 236 | Is the rear bumber for a 47-53 1/2 t. different from the front bumper? The holes in the rear brakets match up with the holes in the front bumper. The catalogs usually only list front bumpers. Whats up with that?
Glenn, | | | | | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | 1947-1955 front bumpers are the same for the ½ & ¾ ton the 1 ton bumper was the same style but “almost another 3rd thicker 1947-1953 rear was a flatter style the 1947-55 panel , suburban & canopy exp. Was the same as the front | | | | | Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 887 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 887 | I think the front and rear bumpers were slightly different. Chevy Duty, LMC and Jim Carter seem to have different parts for front and back. I believe the bolt holes are the same so you could switch them, or use two of the same, but front and back are not identical.
I read somewhere that lots of farmers removed the rear bumper to be able to back the bed right up to the loading dock so they are often missing from the truck.
'51 Chevy 1/2 ton w/'62 261, HEI, offy, fentons, dual carter/webbers, t-5 & 12 bolt posi
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 587 | Yes, different. But it is important to note that in 1951 rear bumpers became optional. That is probably another reason they are so hard to find. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 163 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 163 | I have a rear bumper off a 51 1/2 ton that I would let someone have cheap + shipping. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 223 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 223 | The 47-53 front and rear bumpers are different on these trucks. The Front have a much greater curve to them at the ends. The rear is much flatter overall. I believe the 54-55 rears are notably different as they have a notch in the center of them. All the vendors have repops for both front and rear. The repops are not as heavy guage as orginals. Original rears are harder to find in good shape than fronts. It appears a lot of them were badly bent while chain towing lesser makes of vehicles. | | |
| |
| |