The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Donf, Shade Baby, Jon G, Bill Hanlon, rfs56trk, Hotrod Lincoln), 154 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,105
Posts1,056,208
Members48,436
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#12057 06/21/2004 9:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 73
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 73
Could someone explain to what why the mustang II setup is so kewl, and what is involved in the swap,. I could use the education as I just bought a 1952 GMC 1/2 ton and want to fixerup. I guess now is the time to find out options for my new "best friend". Thanks gang , you folks have been great!

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,522
Jimmyjeep, most decisions are based on cost, parts available and ease of installation. I used the stangII on my 37 pickup because I could get the entire front end out of a 78 stand including the rack and pinion and brake booster etc to use for a core when getting a new one.All this for $75 bucks and an couple hours of my time to take it out. Another reason is a fellow at work had fabricated the cross members and spring towers etc for many years and many folks. SO, we plated the side of the original 37 chassis and he fabricated the cross member,spring towers and had it were I could attach the rack and pinion etc. I in turn traded him an old heating system I had taken out of a service station. You can now buy the stangII kits for around 1500 but by the time you buy ALL the stuff you will have far more in it. I only had to buy the chev bolt pattern rotors and they fit the stang spindle and I used the stang calipers.
On the other hand a clip from a Nova, Camaro may say you some headaches and a fellow here on the bolt left a message some folks are using some 70's Oldsmobile stuff( in response to my question on what would work good on my 40 sedan.
If I had it to do over again I would most likely go the same route. Think about it and I'm sure other bolters will give you some advice. Be patient and make the right choice for YOU.


1937 Chevy Pickup
In the Gallery
1952 Chevy Panel
In the Gallery
More photos
1950 Chevy Coupe
Pictures!

I'd rather walk and carry a Chevy hub cap than ride in a Ferd.
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you smile
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 703
J
Jed Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 703
Jimmy Jeep: My thoughts on the Mustang 2 suspension is the number of after market parts that you can get to dress it up is what makes it so attractive. They've got it now where you can get any type of bolt pattern, multiple sizes of calipers and rotors, chrome or painted control arms, and various springs etc. Before you set out a bunch of money on the "stang" though, I would give you a couple of other thoughts. First; how about a Corvair w/a mustang rack or secondly an AMC Pacer. A couple of years ago, I built a 41 Chev sedan and used the pacer, The whole car only cost me $75.00, and I not only got the front end, but a real nice tilt wheel to boot. It's a pretty neat set-up, as it's bolted into the Pacer. Real easy to unbolt and roll out from underneath the car. Ready to go with power rack and pinion, standard 5 bolt pattern, and larger rotors and better springs than a standard mustang. The other thing I really liked about it was that the cross member is basically a cradle. Stock, it will put you way down in the weeds. However, you can get the truck as high as you want it by placing perches (for the frame rails to sit on) in the cradle. I'm not sure about the fit on the truck, but I would think it would have to be close to that of my sedan. One last thing. The pacer is wider than the stock mustang, and a whole lot more stout. Good Luck.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 398
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 398
A link which may be of some interest...

www.chevytrucks.org/tech/ifs.htm

Also, Toad Hauler/Fatfendered Toad (Skip Whitfield) who is a member here, has done the Pacer IFS swap on one of his (several) Advance Design series trucks, which is the same era and design as your GMC. Hopefully, he'll notice this post and chime in with his thoughts on how well this conversion works in "The Real World."

Hope this helps. smile

Regards,
Wannabe smile


"Don't expect anything and you'll never be disappointed"

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0