Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,192 Posts1,057,351 Members48,469 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 | I am looking at adding rear turn signals to my Carryall and want to be authentic. Does anyone know if 1939 chevy automobile tail-lights are the same as used on the Carryalls? These are mounted high up on the body, left and right. The curvature in the mounting surface of the 1939 tail lights looks to be a very close fit to the curvature of the Carryall body in that area.
Any help is appreciated
Best Regards, all
Lisa
1952 Chevy Carryall in completely original condition Pulled out of a barn in Colorado high desert
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 4,261 "Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!! | | "Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!! Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 4,261 | Get the lights that fit? Chev's of the 40's and others have them. Like this: http://www.bunchobikes.com/1952suburban184.JPGUnless you mean higher than that? | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | Those 1939 Oldsmobile lamps look very nice.
If riverdancer9 wants to be "authentic", that mounting base is not the same as the mounting bases on the 47-55 GM panel-body truck's GM accessory lamps. | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | My understanding is they are the same as used on the '39 Chevy. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 | I could easily purchase a new set of these from numerous suppliers. But I wish to keep my vehicle completely original, and have found a pair of the 1939 rear lights that are vintage, and original.
So my question really is: Did GM re-purpose the 1939 tail lights as the turn signals on the AD series of Carryalls?
The mounting base and dimensions look to be identical between the 1939 and AD design Carryalls. I am referring to The Filling Station part number BA-356, which is called out for both the '39 chevy as well as the AD Carryall. Pages 204-205 in the catalog.
Lisa
1952 Chevy Carryall in completely original condition Pulled out of a barn in Colorado high desert
| | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | You cannot keep a vehicle completely original by adding parts. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,441 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,441 | Riverdancer9, if you will substitute "Period Correct" for "Completely Original" you will make Cletis and other purists happy. 
Martin '62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress) '47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project) ‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily) ‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence) “I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one! Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop! USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 | Thank you - I am trying to make the vehicle Period Correct 
Lisa
1952 Chevy Carryall in completely original condition Pulled out of a barn in Colorado high desert
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,217 Moderator | | Moderator Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,217 | riverdancer9, my lamps have a faint stamping on the top of body, OLDSIG. There should be a weep hole on the bottom, in the chrome collar. Also, as Tim mentioned, they mount different from the newer ones. Be careful that you don't mount them too far back, although with yours being a Suburban it might not matter. On my panel, the doors hit when opened all the way 180*. | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | The correct ones are stamped DORAY. And Leo is correct, Suburban doors don't open to 180° like panel doors do. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 79 | Thank you Tim - I assume that the sketch, when printed will be to scale. And that the door opening is the rear opening for either clamshell or barn-door configuration - is that correct?
Thank you - riverdancer9
Lisa
1952 Chevy Carryall in completely original condition Pulled out of a barn in Colorado high desert
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | That is correct, as long as your PC software prints PDF "to scale".
I'd print out the pattern, and mark the holes on the body in chalk/crayon/marker, and tape the lamp to the body aligned with the hole markings, and gently/slowly open the rear door, and hope the doors do not touch the lamp. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 4,261 "Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!! | | "Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!! Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 4,261 | Plus you can stand back from the side and the rear to see if they "look right." | | | | | Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 1,146 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 1,146 | I have a couple of questions. Why does Chevs of the 40's show 1947-53 Tail Light Assembly -Panel & Suburban Don't these bullet directional lamps assemblies fit on all 1947-55 single unit bodies? Jim Carter's Tech article - Panel Truck Tail Light -- shows lamp assembly part# 916877. Isn't this the same lamp assembly used on all the 1947-55 single unit bodies? It does say, These small bullet shaped lights were actually from a 1939 Chevrolet passenger car. Then Jim Carter has this Tech Article - 1947-1955 Tail Lights read the last paragraph. Its says, Turn single option today 1947-1955 single unit body. It does say again, These small bullet shaped lights were actually from a 1939 Chevrolet passenger car. Then there is this RPO 249 Dual Tail and Stop Lamp In the 1947-54 Factory Assembly Manual. Which shows lamp assembly part# 897461 LH and 897462 RH. Is this the same as part# 916877 ? Here is what I know is a original 1954 Lamp Assembly RH , DURAY. This is what it shows in the 1929 - 1957 Chevrolet Master Parts & Accessories Catalog Group # 2.679 It shows 1954-55 part# 897461 Left and 897462 Right. But not part# 916877 It shows 1939-52 Part# 927639 L, and 927640 R Where there different bullet directional lamps assemblies made just for the 1954-55 single unit bodies? Here is rubber Tail Light Pads that are to go in between the lamp housing and the truck body. There is also a reinforcement plate that goes on the inside. Jim Carter shows them as 1947-Early 1955 (Accessory) Panel and Suburban The difference in parts numbers may have something to do with one wire or two wire lamp assemblies. Also if you ordered the RPO 249 Dual Tail and Stop Lamp for the single unit body truck. Did they put the Tail/stop Lamp on the rear left barn door? | | | | | Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,217 Moderator | | Moderator Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,217 | riverdancer9, back to your original question, check the overall length of the '39 Chev lights. My Olds lights are actually about an inch longer than the correct ones. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,132 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,132 | I have the 39 car taillights on my49 sub with barn doors, I used the template in tim Ledermans post and the barn doors do not hit the lights,
Weeds | | |
| |