The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Hotrod Lincoln, Otto Skorzeny, HandyAndy, Guitplayer, Hush), 151 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,034
Posts1,055,540
Members48,425
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1099163 04/24/2015 4:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
P
New Guy
New Guy
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
I am restoring a 64 Chevy C-10. I have a 350 motor and a 700R4 transmission. The rear I have is a 3.42. Is that a good combination? I'm looking for something with good highway speed and lower rpm's. Not looking to race it.

pager #1099244 04/24/2015 9:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
That is ideal.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
pager #1099249 04/24/2015 9:52 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
That would give an OD ratio of about 2.40. That sounds high geared to me.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
pager #1099305 04/25/2015 3:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,198
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,198
Here is a bunch of good information,

http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/[censored]-poor-mileage-from-a-700r4.972740/

I would think a 3.73 or 3.90 would be a much better choice. You have a heavy truck that is going to push a bunch of air at highway speeds, so if the motor doesn't make all its torque at very low rpm, you are going to have trouble with downshifting and poor milage.

joe

pager #1099320 04/25/2015 4:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
You must remember that carbureted engines are happier at about 500 to 1000 RPM more than today's EFI engines. A 3.42 with OD would only run good down hill or with a strong tail wind.

pager #1099752 04/27/2015 9:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
I have 3:38 rear gears in my 56 & a t5 with .73 O-drive. 350 stock engine. It will run up hill on the freeway all day long with out bogging. I had a 70 stepside with 3:08 gears, 350 engine & 700R4 trans. I have a long hill on the freeway going home from the shop. It will pull it at 70 MPH in o-drive with A/C on. These 350 engines have a lot of low speed grunt unless a guy puts too much cam in it.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
pager #1100270 04/30/2015 8:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
P
New Guy
New Guy
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
Thanks for the info. Right now I will try the 3:42 rear. Once I get this baby running, I think I might move to the 3:73. Everyone I spoke with said that would be the better choice.

pager #1100595 05/03/2015 12:03 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
E
Crusing in the Passing Lane
Crusing in the Passing Lane
E Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
The 3.42 might be good swapping material, too, although not many mountains in MD.


'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires.
'47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle.
'54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed.
'55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
pager #1100881 05/04/2015 11:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 48
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 48
I would think you would want to account for you tire size when you are doing this too. Without putting the tire size into the equation, you cannot get an accurate final reading of what your rpm's will be. There are all kinds of rpm calculators on the interwebs. They figure out your engine rpm based on tire size, transmission gear ratio, and rear-end gear ratio. I did a bunch of this when I changed out my 3 speed for a 5 speed on my car.


Matt
Blacktop Cannibals Car Club
1954 Chevy mild custom car
1955 Chevy second series 3200

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0