Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,035 Posts1,055,567 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#10984 01/04/2004 5:52 AM | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 586 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 586 | Has anyone found at least a 30" dia tire to fit on a 15" rim? Also need to keep tread width under 6". Since I need tires anyway I'm going to try and get the largest tire possible so that I, hopefully, can get decent highway speed without changeing the rear end. | | |
#10985 01/04/2004 6:05 AM | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 | A 265/75R15 tire will give you a tire height of 30.6 inches | | |
#10986 01/04/2004 6:09 AM | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 252 | Ooooops!!! That will also give you a tread width of 8.2 inches. To get a 6" tread width you have to go all the way down to a 205/75R15 27.3 heightand 5.9 wide or a 215/75R15 at 27.9 height and 6.1 wide, and those will definatly not help with you gear ratio problem | | |
#10987 01/04/2004 6:24 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I have BF Goodrich 235-70/15s on my 55 1st suburban, and don't have any trouble with the tires hitting anything.
The fronts did just touch on the inside behind the axle, but when I converted to disk brakes they moved outside just enough to stop that.
I think these are only 28.5 tall, but the 8-inch width isn't a problem, so you might be able to use the same width with a taller aspect ratio and be okay?
Hope this helps...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#10988 01/04/2004 7:03 AM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 1,438 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 1,438 | I'm running 255 15s on the rear of my '40 1/2 ton. They sometimes scuffs slightly against the bed if one tire is lifted so the whole thing tilts especially when carrying a load. The tires are about perfectly centered in the well. I plan to move to the next size narrower when I replace them.
40 Chevy 1/2 ton
| | |
#10989 01/05/2004 2:56 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 | I did some research before I bought mine; I wanted the tallest/narrowest 15" radial I could find that looked good too. I have been very happy with these: Tall tires . Some tire shops won't want to order these for you, but any of them can. I found a tire shop manager that happen to like what I was trying to accomplish. They are very nice tires and should last a long time being an 8 ply LT. The worst thing about them is that they have "Yokohama" on the side walls. But they are black-wall and not too noticable. Check out the dimensions... Hope this helps. | | |
#10990 01/05/2004 3:22 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 | | | |
#10991 01/05/2004 4:02 PM | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | I'll give an enthusiastic 2nd to those 700R15LT Yokohamas, Russ - they look good, raised my 58 about 2" [gonna take a while to learn to quit trippin on the door step!] - made it like power steering compared to the old passenger radials - the narrow tread reduces rolling resistance too - trucks were meant to have truck tires!! I got the ribs on the front, lugs on back [it is a work truck]
Bill | | |
#10992 01/05/2004 7:22 PM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | Only problem is those are 8 ply tires, he has a 1/2 ton truck, according to his profile. They will work, but the ride will be rougher.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
#10993 01/05/2004 7:55 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 | I was thinking along the same lines with my 55.1 with the 3.9 rear. I converted back to the 16 inch wheels, then I put on some Power King Bias tires that are 31 dia. I think they are 6,5 wide. They don't rub anywhere. I see some Power King snows that are 33 dia. and am thinking of getting them for the rear sometime. - Scott
55 1st Chev.
| | |
#10994 01/06/2004 2:47 AM | Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 60 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 60 | I have looked into the springfield tire 33 X 91/2 X 15 around $120 nice and tall 33" a little wide 9 1/2" made for a light truck.I'm still looking around? good luck Bill
Bill 1951 3/4 ton 5 window pick up 1955 GMC 1/2 ton longbed automatic
| | |
#10995 01/06/2004 4:58 AM | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 586 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 586 | Thanks for all the input. I also got contacted via e-mail and was told about Firestone and B F Goodrich have a 820-15 with a overall diameter of 29.56 and a tread width of 5.40. The forum did it again. If anyone else is interested, Firestone also has a 890-15 whitewall with a 31" dia. and still has about a 5" tread width. | | |
#10996 01/06/2004 5:43 AM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | I recently bought a couple of Yokohama radial truck tires (I think 10 ply?) . . . they were for a bigger truck - 10.00 x 20. This was the single best purchase I have made to improve ride, steering and smoothness. When I go to get new tires for the '49 - I will take a serious look at Yokohama tires, the quality is outstanding. | | |
#10997 01/06/2004 2:23 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 182 | The eight ply Yokohama's I posted a link for and have on my 1/2 ton 52' ride very nice. 51Jimmy: If you wind up getting one of the tall BF Goodrich or Firestones that you mention...please post a picture sometime. (oh yeah, there's pictures of my tires on the link below) | | |
#10998 01/06/2004 5:55 PM | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 31 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2001 Posts: 31 | Good luck on that one! (I think that breaks down to about 155/125R15 -- just over 30" X 6") Many of the tall tires produced by the big names show up overseas but don't seem to be available here. How about fitting some inexpensive 16" steel wheels? Your tall tire selection will increase dramatically. Here are some web tools that I have found useful: Wheel swap thread. Good luck! - AJ | | |
#10999 01/06/2004 8:49 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I see that there are tall tires for 16" wheels. I have 2 questions:
1) Are any of these radials tubless ?
2) Are there any 16" x 5.5 or 6" rims with the 8 hole pattern available ? This would be a correct fit for the old AD 1 Tons, backspacing and all. | | |
#11000 01/06/2004 10:05 PM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | 1) Are any of these radials tubless? Yes. I'm running 7.50R16 on the back of my 52. 2) Are there any 16" x 5.5 or 6" rims with the 8 hole pattern available ? This would be a correct fit for the old AD 1 Tons, backspacing and all. Yes. But the backspacing kills you. I have a pair off an early 90's model. Same bolt pattern, center hole, and you can even put your hubcap clips on. On the rears, the tire clears the frame by 3/4". On the front I would need 2" spacers. I have plans of putting in a late model differential under mine, with these rims I will have a little less than 1" clearance to the fenders.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
#11001 01/07/2004 12:20 AM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | Fred T, what is the width of those rims? Because the modern Chevy rims of 7" widths have a backset of about 4 1/2" but I would think that a 5 1/2" rim would have a backset of around 3" ? | | |
#11002 01/07/2004 3:00 AM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | Just a comment on the above link. I have read that before. I think that the 1 Ton is a little tighter on space at the front. The factory rims have a backset of 3" and 4" would be out of the question. I read Bob Adler's column where he said the problem had already been solved, well maybe for the 3/4 Ton but not for the 1 Ton. | | |
#11003 01/07/2004 3:02 AM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | If I remember right, the rims are 6.5" wide. Setback is somewhere around 4.75". Total width of the mounted tire is 9". When I measured the differential I got it was 52" across the backing plates, and 72" total width with the 7.50R16 tires.
Wally/Montana found that some Dodge rims had the correct bolt pattern and center. I'm thinking his were actually made for a trailer, which made hubcaps unusable, my reason for sticking with the GM wheels. The inside of the rim center was the same size.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
| |