| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Otto Skorzeny),
95
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,154 Posts1,056,856 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2010 Posts: 13 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2010 Posts: 13 | I have a 1950 Chevy half ton p/u model 3100 with the original Huck Brake (`47 thru 50)set up. BACKGROUND Truck has been totally restored (Frame Off)and throughout the restoration "all" the chassis / suspension parts ID #'s and/or casting #'s were the original / unaltered part per the `50 Chevy master parts manual. So clearly the truck has not been altered over the years. QUESTION The 50 Chevy is "supposed" to have 2 ~ 90 degree tabs spot welded to the axel backing plate such that the Brake Shoe Hold-Down Spring & Retainer Wires can be installed. Clearly the spot welded tabs (1947 thru 1950) are not there, have never been there, (i.e. no weld marks) thus the brake shoes can not be anchored properly so thus they can "wander/shimmy" within the brake drum thus creating noise & possibly poor braking. On later models (1951 and newer)the backing plate had holes such that the more modern brake shoe hold down springs could be used. In an attempt to correct for the missing tabs, I have drilled the holes in the back plate, installed the more modern brake shoe hold down clips; but there is not enough clearance between the clip and the brake drum which must be the reason that "tabs" were used in the `47 to `50 Chevy 1/2 ton trucks. BOTTOM LINE Has anyone ever run across this situation before? and if so what is the fix? Clearly the clips were never there (no evidence of a spot weld),so is it possible that back in this era that "sloppy" manufacturing practices could have periodically missed this process?
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,298 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,298 | I ran into that scenario with my '50. My conclusion is that some of the Huck brakes did not use the center hold down springs and therefore had no 90 degree tabs nor holes in the backing plate for them. Given that the shoes are anchored relatively solid at the bottom pivot pins as apposed to free-floating as in the Bendix design, perhaps it was determined in 1950 by GM that these springs were actually unneeded. I have run mine for 4800 miles without any issues. No bad noises, and during an emergency stop the truck makes all of the noises of a truck stopping (squealing tires), as it comes to an eventual stop in a very straight line. Just as designed, albeit scary. Carl
Last edited by 52Carl; 11/11/2014 2:44 AM.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | |
| |
| |