The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
7 members (Guitplayer, klhansen, Otto Skorzeny, Phak1, CATMAN, Philipj, CharlieF), 95 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,153
Posts1,056,847
Members48,456
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
C
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
C Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
I have a 1950 Chevy half ton p/u model 3100 with the original Huck Brake (`47 thru 50)set up.
BACKGROUND
Truck has been totally restored (Frame Off)and throughout the restoration "all" the chassis / suspension parts ID #'s and/or casting #'s were the original / unaltered part per the `50 Chevy master parts manual. So clearly the truck has not been altered over the years.
QUESTION
The 50 Chevy is "supposed" to have 2 ~ 90 degree tabs spot welded to the axel backing plate such that the Brake Shoe Hold-Down Spring & Retainer Wires can be installed.
Clearly the spot welded tabs (1947 thru 1950) are not there, have never been there, (i.e. no weld marks) thus the brake shoes can not be anchored properly so thus they can "wander/shimmy" within the brake drum thus creating noise & possibly poor braking. On later models (1951 and newer)the backing plate had holes such that the more modern brake shoe hold down springs could be used.
In an attempt to correct for the missing tabs, I have drilled the holes in the back plate, installed the more modern brake shoe hold down clips; but there is not enough clearance between the clip and the brake drum which must be the reason that "tabs" were used in the `47 to `50 Chevy 1/2 ton trucks.
BOTTOM LINE
Has anyone ever run across this situation before? and if so what is the fix?
Clearly the clips were never there (no evidence of a spot weld),so is it possible that back in this era that "sloppy" manufacturing practices could have periodically missed this process?

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,298
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,298
I ran into that scenario with my '50. My conclusion is that some of the Huck brakes did not use the center hold down springs and therefore had no 90 degree tabs nor holes in the backing plate for them. Given that the shoes are anchored relatively solid at the bottom pivot pins as apposed to free-floating as in the Bendix design, perhaps it was determined in 1950 by GM that these springs were actually unneeded. I have run mine for 4800 miles without any issues. No bad noises, and during an emergency stop the truck makes all of the noises of a truck stopping (squealing tires), as it comes to an eventual stop in a very straight line. Just as designed, albeit scary.
Carl

Last edited by 52Carl; 11/11/2014 2:44 AM.

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0