BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
8 members (booger, Mike Roache, 32vsnake, COCOE, cmayna, 1955 1 Series, festerhairball, Jon G),
454
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,265 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 53 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 53 | I was hoping someone could set me straight on an issue I have, I have bought two kits, one called a anti squeak kit and the other is called a inner fender gasket kit. I have read in that monster post on assembling front fenders and I have found posts about the material used to make the gaskets but I could not fine detailed info on where exactly these two kits go, you will have to bare with me as it wasn't me who took this truck apart and this is my first truck. Thanks in advance. Ken Kit 1 Kit 2 ** In kit 1 there are 2 each of the bigger pieces at the back, they were not included in the pic. Thanks for the help with the post.
Last edited by Kennyjr; 09/12/2014 5:59 AM.
| | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Your links draw a blank, plus we have no idea what year or model truck you have. Gasket/anti-squeak....same ting. See if this helps, this is for the advance design truck: http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/137706613/originalDG
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 215 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 215 | One kit looks like a complete kit, while the other is the fender seals only. I don't know what kind of truck, but the additional parts look like radiator support mounts, or something like that. | | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 53 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 53 | Sorry about that, it is a 54 Chev 3600 long box. The first kit is from LMC here on this page part number 15 and the other kit is from Classic Parts here and as you can see they are both different in which has caused me some confusion. Kit 1 looks like a more complete kit although there was no staples and kit 2 looks like just the seals as you say but with staples. I understand the long tar paper in kit 1 goes between the fender and skirt and the long foam piece in kit one fits on the top front edge of the skirt, I am just not sure where the 4 square rubbers go or where the 2 round rubbers go and the small foam pieces as well. I think both kits are for the same thing just that each have a few different pieces. I have read about having staple holes in the skirt for kit 2 but there where none in either of the skirts I have. Thanks for the replies and any help at all is really appreciated. Ken
Last edited by Kennyjr; 09/12/2014 9:55 PM.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 215 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 215 | Somebody familiar with the model years will have to help you. Some kits do come with parts that fit some model years and not others, so you may not need all the pieces. | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 Bubba - Curmudgeon | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 | Your LMC link shows: part number 30.2319 for 1947-55st I have no idea what the small square and round parts are? The Classic Parts' 37-725 is for the same years It looks like the Classic Parts kits come with the foam rubber channel to seal the Firewall Filler Panels | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | I have been driving a 50 AD for 3500 miles without any anti-squeak and have no squeaks, groans, rumbles of any kind. My opinion so far, is that this stuff is over-rated/unnecessary. Since you can't see it once installed, no one knows the difference. I am sure there was a reason Chevrolet used it. Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | I think those pieces were more 'gaskets' to keep road spray from between pieces and out of the engine compartment, the 'anti-sqeak' aspect was secondary
Bill | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Okey dokey...I know it's really unusual for me to be disagreeable, but I'm gonna be on the disagreement side of this one guys. Once again I have to ask, why would GM waste their time installing a gasket/anti-squeak material on millions of vehicles for decades if it wasn't necessary? The cab, hanging from it's shackles and front clip do move around some as the frame twists. This is my opinion now so take it as that, but I feel that it's needed as a buffer between two metal parts. I think Bill's correct, where it's second purpose is to act as a seal. With out it, water would work it's way thru the bolt holes at the inner skirt/toe board interface and outer/inner fender seam and the paint will wear thru at points of contact where rust will develop. Of course if you have a trailer queen which mostly sits on a throne in an air conditioned, climate controlled garage and never sees a rain drop or high humidity, then this is a mute point and you can leave it out. Hope you know I'm just pokin' fun at ya Carl... The square pads are for the lower radiator support and the round pads are for the front cab mount. The staples probably will not match up to the original holes, I threw the ones they sent me away and made my own. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/123537640But it's simple enough to make a handful of them up using your choice of Bailing wire/Mechanics Wire/Lock wire, which is available at any hardware supplier or in most tool boxes of the average handyman. http://www.harborfreight.com/25-ft-mechanics-wire-97773.htmlDenny Graham Sandwich, IL
Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/13/2014 10:56 AM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | Good points on the extreme amount of flexing with so few anchoring points for the entire front clip. It is almost like the front clip is held in place by imagination. I suspect that I will eventually have issues with my 50. The truck was a barn find that was kind of thrown together in a rush after removal for a rebuilt engine so that I could drive it while I finished my 49. I would not normally cut those kind of corners, but this time I did and wanted to report the lack of issues after 3500 miles. Trailer Queen? You will need to poke harder than that DG.  Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | I had the same idea in mind for my '54, that is, gonna have a driver while I finish my '50. That was four years ago, then starting my life all over again at the new place got in the way and I'm still driving my unfinished '50.
dg
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,285 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,285 | Tearing down my truck, I think I have found more of that "gummy strip stuff" we used to call dum dum than anything. It is that playdough looking stuff that comes in strips and never dries hard. There is definitely anti-squeak tactics taken in the cab and front end but not so much in the bed and rear part of the truck. I Think they made an effort to quiet down the "living area". The work part of the truck ...not so much. | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | I am curious to know what that c-channel anti-squeak/seal material was actually made of. It was used on the firewall/fender filler panels, under the dash above the heater hole behind the inner cowl, and on the rear section of the inner fender. Seems to be a lot of engineers posting on this site. Any of you guys chemical engineers, or do you all drive choo-choo trains. (I'll bet you guys never get tired of that line.  ) Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | All we have available to us now days is 30# asphalt felt paper, you know, roofing paper. That's exactly what the vendors are selling also. When I first got into my truck a decade ago, I'd ordered one of the pre-cut kits and the piece I got had the white lettering or chalk lines still on it indicating it was just that, roofing paper. In my case it was not even 30# material, it was 15# so....I cut my own from a roll of 30#. The original anti-squeak was the same type of material, i.e., felt paper, but it was a heavier stock than even the 30# material. I believe it would have been more like 50#. I've been looking for years for material heavier then 30# but found none so far. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/137706613/largeDG
Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/15/2014 4:45 AM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | Denny, I'm wondering about the other stuff that may or may not be natural rubber that is u-shaped in cross section. Carl
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Ahhh, yes. It was probably styrene-butadiene rubber, I've read where it was developed during the war and was the primary type of foam that was produced after WWII. Now-a-days polyurethane-based foams are used in the majority of the products. I had pictures of all of it that I took off my '50 when I pulled the front clip in '09, but they're being held captive on my old hard drive. The cross section of the reproduction material is not as thick and the compound seems to be more dense than the original foam. Because of that it really doesn't fill the gaps nor does it seal as well as the original stuff. Now you done it Carl, got me goin' on that foam bit.... I poured ridged poly for the '54 clock housings and GMC parking light lenses that I was experimenting with last winter. Since I've got all this spare time on my hands and since I wasn't happy with the reproduction foam seals, you got me thinking about making up a mold and trying some of the urethane or silicone foams from Reynolds. Looks like a good project for the basement if we get snow bound this winter. http://www.reynoldsam.com/product-category/foam/ dg
Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/16/2014 12:48 PM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 Bubba - Curmudgeon | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 | Denny, If your filler panel seals are big enough to close the gaps around those plates, I'd be pleased to test out the seals on one of my vehicles.  | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | By the time I get around to it Tim you will probably be ready for a new set of tires. Ain't gonna be any molds made till I get the mills up and running and they ain't gonna be running till I get the electric run to the other end of the building and that ain't gonna be possible till I get the insulation and sheeting on the inside wall and that probably ain't gonna get done till I get the flue thru the roof so I can get some heat out to the shop. Soooooo....you see, lots of wishful thinkin' goin' on around here.
dg
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,946 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,946 | By the time I get around to it Tim you will probably be ready for a new set of tires. Ain't gonna be any molds made till I get the mills up and running and they ain't gonna be running till I get the electric run to the other end of the building and that ain't gonna be possible till I get the insulation and sheeting on the inside wall and that probably ain't gonna get done till I get the flue thru the roof so I can get some heat out to the shop.
dg In other words it won't be till some time next week!!  | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | In other words, my allowance for this week is spent Rich. At least that's what I thought. Did manage to find enough change in my purse to order a 'Trial unit' of foam. That way I'll have it if I get snowed in next month. Figured it's worth thirty bucks for the experiment to see if I can make a better, or should I say, more accurate, foam seal than the vendors are selling. I know from last winters projects that I can't make GMC Beehive Parking Light Lenses as well as the vendors, or 1954 Truck Clock Housings as well as Marty. So lets see if I can make foam seals as well as Steele or Wang.
Now....to address that heat issue in the barn!!
DG
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | Now....to address that heat issue in the barn!!
DG How about putting all that heat in trash bags and save it till winter? Peachy
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,440 Extreme Gabster | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,440 | OK Guys, we've had fun jiving but let's get back on topic please.
Thanks. | | | | Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 | My 2 cents: You know that "Peel & Seal" stuff they sell at Home Depot? I used it on my step side fenders & roll pan as welting when I put the bed back together. It is soft aluminum faced, self sticking and cuts easily. Might be something you'd like to try. Check out post #105 here for some photos: http://talk.classicparts.com/showthread.php?t=13928&page=7Hope that helps.  John | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | I like the idea that it would seal out water from getting between the two metal parts, where the standard fender welting really doesn't do a good job of sealing. Gets me old brain goin' with the idea of using the standard fender welting in combination with a sealer such as dumdum. Might have a real hard time getting the two apart though, but, it's not all thought out yet. The 30# roofing paper anti-squeak is really to thin unless the two metal parts are perfectly parallel to each other, and we all know that a sheet metal inner skirt is never gonna be parallel to anything else on these old trucks.
Interesting build pictures on the other site John. You been at it pretty steady since 2008?
Hey, check your pm's please.
Denny G
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | |
| |