The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (Woodcmiami, newtonlr, moparguy), 613 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,259
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1055615 09/12/2014 4:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
K
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
K Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
I was hoping someone could set me straight on an issue I have, I have bought two kits, one called a anti squeak kit and the other is called a inner fender gasket kit.
I have read in that monster post on assembling front fenders and I have found posts about the material used to make the gaskets but I could not fine detailed info on where exactly these two kits go, you will have to bare with me as it wasn't me who took this truck apart and this is my first truck. Thanks in advance.

Ken

Kit 1

Kit 2

** In kit 1 there are 2 each of the bigger pieces at the back, they were not included in the pic.

Thanks for the help with the post.

Last edited by Kennyjr; 09/12/2014 5:59 AM.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
Your links draw a blank, plus we have no idea what
year or model truck you have.
Gasket/anti-squeak....same ting.
See if this helps, this is for the advance design truck:
http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/137706613/original

DG


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
W
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
One kit looks like a complete kit, while the other is the fender seals only. I don't know what kind of truck, but the additional parts look like radiator support mounts, or something like that.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
K
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
K Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Sorry about that, it is a 54 Chev 3600 long box.
The first kit is from LMC here on this page part number 15 and the other kit is from Classic Parts here and as you can see they are both different in which has caused me some confusion. Kit 1 looks like a more complete kit although there was no staples and kit 2 looks like just the seals as you say but with staples.
I understand the long tar paper in kit 1 goes between the fender and skirt and the long foam piece in kit one fits on the top front edge of the skirt, I am just not sure where the 4 square rubbers go or where the 2 round rubbers go and the small foam pieces as well.
I think both kits are for the same thing just that each have a few different pieces. I have read about having staple holes in the skirt for kit 2 but there where none in either of the skirts I have. Thanks for the replies and any help at all is really appreciated.

Ken

Last edited by Kennyjr; 09/12/2014 9:55 PM.
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
W
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
Somebody familiar with the model years will have to help you. Some kits do come with parts that fit some model years and not others, so you may not need all the pieces.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Your LMC link shows: part number 30.2319 for 1947-55st
I have no idea what the small square and round parts are?

The Classic Parts' 37-725 is for the same years

It looks like the Classic Parts kits come with the foam rubber channel to seal the Firewall Filler Panels

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
I have been driving a 50 AD for 3500 miles without any anti-squeak and have no squeaks, groans, rumbles of any kind. My opinion so far, is that this stuff is over-rated/unnecessary. Since you can't see it once installed, no one knows the difference. I am sure there was a reason Chevrolet used it.
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
F
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
I think those pieces were more 'gaskets' to keep road spray from between pieces and out of the engine compartment, the 'anti-sqeak' aspect was secondary

Bill


Moved over to the Passing Lane

"When we tug a single thing in nature, we find it attached to the rest of the world" ~ John Muir
"When we tug a single thing on an old truck, we find it falls off" ~ me
Some TF series details & TF heater pics
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
Okey dokey...I know it's really unusual for me to be
disagreeable, but I'm gonna be on the disagreement side of
this one guys. Once again I have to ask, why would GM waste
their time installing a gasket/anti-squeak material on
millions of vehicles for decades if it wasn't necessary?
The cab, hanging from it's shackles and front clip do move
around some as the frame twists.
This is my opinion now so take it as that, but I feel that
it's needed as a buffer between two metal parts.
I think Bill's correct, where it's second purpose is to act as
a seal. With out it, water would work it's way thru the bolt
holes at the inner skirt/toe board interface and outer/inner
fender seam and the paint will wear thru at points of contact
where rust will develop. Of course if you have a trailer
queen which mostly sits on a throne in an air conditioned,
climate controlled garage and never sees a rain drop or high
humidity, then this is a mute point and you can leave it out.
Hope you know I'm just pokin' fun at ya Carl...
The square pads are for the lower radiator support and the
round pads are for the front cab mount.
The staples probably will not match up to the original holes,
I threw the ones they sent me away and made my own.
http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/123537640
But it's simple enough to make a handful of them up using your
choice of Bailing wire/Mechanics Wire/Lock wire, which is
available at any hardware supplier or in most tool boxes of
the average handyman.
http://www.harborfreight.com/25-ft-mechanics-wire-97773.html

Denny Graham
Sandwich, IL


Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/13/2014 10:56 AM.

Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Good points on the extreme amount of flexing with so few anchoring points for the entire front clip. It is almost like the front clip is held in place by imagination. I suspect that I will eventually have issues with my 50. The truck was a barn find that was kind of thrown together in a rush after removal for a rebuilt engine so that I could drive it while I finished my 49. I would not normally cut those kind of corners, but this time I did and wanted to report the lack of issues after 3500 miles.
Trailer Queen? You will need to poke harder than that DG. smile
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
I had the same idea in mind for my '54, that is, gonna have a
driver while I finish my '50. That was four years ago, then
starting my life all over again at the new place got in the
way and I'm still driving my unfinished '50.

dg


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,285
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,285
Tearing down my truck, I think I have found more of that "gummy strip stuff" we used to call dum dum than anything. It is that playdough looking stuff that comes in strips and never dries hard. There is definitely anti-squeak tactics taken in the cab and front end but not so much in the bed and rear part of the truck. I Think they made an effort to quiet down the "living area". The work part of the truck ...not so much.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
I am curious to know what that c-channel anti-squeak/seal material was actually made of. It was used on the firewall/fender filler panels, under the dash above the heater hole behind the inner cowl, and on the rear section of the inner fender. Seems to be a lot of engineers posting on this site. Any of you guys chemical engineers, or do you all drive choo-choo trains. (I'll bet you guys never get tired of that line. smile )
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
All we have available to us now days is 30# asphalt felt
paper, you know, roofing paper. That's exactly what the
vendors are selling also.
When I first got into my truck a decade ago, I'd ordered
one of the pre-cut kits and the piece I got had the white
lettering or chalk lines still on it indicating it was
just that, roofing paper. In my case it was not even 30#
material, it was 15# so....I cut my own from a roll of
30#. The original anti-squeak was the same type of material,
i.e., felt paper, but it was a heavier stock than even the
30# material. I believe it would have been more like 50#.
I've been looking for years for material heavier then 30#
but found none so far.
http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/137706613/large
DG

Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/15/2014 4:45 AM.

Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Denny, I'm wondering about the other stuff that may or may not be natural rubber that is u-shaped in cross section.
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
Ahhh, yes. It was probably styrene-butadiene rubber, I've read
where it was developed during the war and was the primary
type of foam that was produced after WWII. Now-a-days
polyurethane-based foams are used in the majority of the products.

I had pictures of all of it that I took off my '50 when I
pulled the front clip in '09, but they're being held captive
on my old hard drive. The cross section of the reproduction
material is not as thick and the compound seems to be more
dense than the original foam. Because of that it really
doesn't fill the gaps nor does it seal as well as the original
stuff.

Now you done it Carl, got me goin' on that foam bit....
I poured ridged poly for the '54 clock housings and GMC
parking light lenses that I was experimenting with last
winter. Since I've got all this spare time on my hands
and since I wasn't happy with the reproduction foam seals,
you got me thinking about making up a mold and trying some
of the urethane or silicone foams from Reynolds. Looks like
a good project for the basement if we get snow bound this winter.
http://www.reynoldsam.com/product-category/foam/

dg

Last edited by Denny Graham; 09/16/2014 12:48 PM.

Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Denny,

If your filler panel seals are big enough to close the gaps around those plates, I'd be pleased to test out the seals on one of my vehicles.

grin

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
By the time I get around to it Tim you will probably be ready
for a new set of tires. Ain't gonna be any molds made till I
get the mills up and running and they ain't gonna be running
till I get the electric run to the other end of the building
and that ain't gonna be possible till I get the insulation
and sheeting on the inside wall and that probably ain't gonna
get done till I get the flue thru the roof so I can get some
heat out to the shop. Soooooo....you see, lots of wishful
thinkin' goin' on around here.

dg


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,946
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,946
Originally Posted by Denny Graham
By the time I get around to it Tim you will probably be ready
for a new set of tires. Ain't gonna be any molds made till I
get the mills up and running and they ain't gonna be running
till I get the electric run to the other end of the building
and that ain't gonna be possible till I get the insulation
and sheeting on the inside wall and that probably ain't gonna
get done till I get the flue thru the roof so I can get some
heat out to the shop.

dg
In other words it won't be till some time next week!! grin grin


Rich
1947 Loadmaster
1947 Chev. Loadmaster
1959 Chev. Viking 40

Life is short--eat dessert first!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
In other words, my allowance for this week is spent Rich. At
least that's what I thought. Did manage to find enough change
in my purse to order a 'Trial unit' of foam. That way I'll
have it if I get snowed in next month. Figured it's worth
thirty bucks for the experiment to see if I can make a
better, or should I say, more accurate, foam seal than the
vendors are selling.
I know from last winters projects that I can't make GMC
Beehive Parking Light Lenses as well as the vendors, or 1954
Truck Clock Housings as well as Marty. So lets see if I can
make foam seals as well as Steele or Wang.

Now....to address that heat issue in the barn!!

DG


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by Denny Graham
Now....to address that heat issue in the barn!!

DG
How about putting all that heat in trash bags and save it till winter?
Peachy


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,440
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,440
OK Guys, we've had fun jiving but let's get back on topic please.

Thanks.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
My 2 cents:

You know that "Peel & Seal" stuff they sell at Home Depot? I used it on my step side fenders & roll pan as welting when I put the bed back together. It is soft aluminum faced, self sticking and cuts easily.

Might be something you'd like to try. Check out post #105 here for some photos: http://talk.classicparts.com/showthread.php?t=13928&page=7

Hope that helps. thumbs_up

John


In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
I like the idea that it would seal out water from getting
between the two metal parts, where the standard fender
welting really doesn't do a good job of sealing. Gets me old
brain goin' with the idea of using the standard fender
welting in combination with a sealer such as dumdum. Might
have a real hard time getting the two apart though, but, it's
not all thought out yet.
The 30# roofing paper anti-squeak is really to thin unless the
two metal parts are perfectly parallel to each other, and we
all know that a sheet metal inner skirt is never gonna be
parallel to anything else on these old trucks.

Interesting build pictures on the other site John. You been at
it pretty steady since 2008?

Hey, check your pm's please.

Denny G


Denny G
Sandwich, IL

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.444s Queries: 14 (0.068s) Memory: 0.7229 MB (Peak: 0.8901 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 01:41:38 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS