The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (Shade Baby, tclederman), 69 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,164
Posts1,056,966
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
My 1954 235 specs says it has a 3.70 rear and Patricks 3.55 would be a lot cheaper than a T5 swap, but can you really "cruise at 65 without engine strain"? Anybody have experience with this combo? Thanks.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
The difference between a 3:70 and a 3:55 is not worth the effort. You could get the same effect by going to one size bigger tire.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Thanks. I'm going to go with the tallest tire I can find in a radial and hopefully I can do 65 without strain. If not, back to the shop.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Mt54,

Which 1954 truck specs says 3.70 rear?

Most likely that is a miss-type of 3.90 standard 1/2 ton rear in 1954 trucks (there was no optional rear in 1954)?

I agree with Don, I wouldn't change from a 3.70, but I did change from a 3.90 to the 3.55 (31.5" diameter radials). I can cruise all day at 65, stopping every 150-180 miles for gas.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
I think he may be working on a car, they had a 3:70 gear in them.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
That is what I thought, Don

Being a truck discussion board, I assumed truck, but I did ask the question about the rear.

Will Patrick's 3.55 R&P set work in a car rear-end?

Will the 3.70 car R&P work on a 47-54 truck rear end (with the right carrier)?

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,248
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,248
Originally Posted by tclederman
That is what I thought, Don

Being a truck discussion board, I assumed truck, but I did ask the question about the rear.

Will Patrick's 3.55 R&P set work in a car rear-end?

Will the 3.70 car R&P work on a 47-54 truck rear end (with the right carrier)?

No, car differential gears are smaller than 1/2 ton pickup, so are the axles. John

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
F
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
Patrick has the 3.55 gears for both car and truck, although they say the one for the car is 'currently not available'

Bill


Moved over to the Passing Lane

"When we tug a single thing in nature, we find it attached to the rest of the world" ~ John Muir
"When we tug a single thing on an old truck, we find it falls off" ~ me
Some TF series details & TF heater pics
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
The 50-54 Powerglide equipped cars came with a 3:55 rear end.

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 18
A
New Guy
New Guy
A Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by red58
Patrick has the 3.55 gears for both car and truck, although they say the one for the car is 'currently not available'

Bill

Interesting point, Bill...I'm glad I'm reading! I had no idea the gear sizes were different from truck to car.

Yesterday, when I spoke with Patrick about purchasing a set of 3.55's, he said they were on order. Then he asked me what I drive. I told him "Fleetline." He then took my address to send me a catalog. So he clearly knows what I need (when the new shipment comes in), but I'll make it a point to specify so that I get the right instructions when I do order.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
Sorry missed the conversation. I see I had looked at car ratios. Now it looks like I might have to do a Patricks swap. Thanks to all!

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
tclederman - What tires are you running at 31.5? Where does that put your rpm at 65 mph?
Thanks.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
3.55 rear
31.5 tire diameter
1.00 top gear
65 mph

2461 rpm

Cooper SRM II, LT 215/85R16 Radial on 4.5" wide 16" original wheel

light truck blackwall radial tire

it has a high/narrow profile and looks "normal"

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
I hear the sweet spot is a little lower rpm. Are you running a stock motor and 4 speed?

My wheels are pretty rusty so I need to source new ones. Did you put tubes in?

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
I agree about the sweet-spot rpm. I run at 60-65 mph for better gas mileage (261 with 2-barrel Holley AA-1 carb used on 302/270 GMC engines).

4-speed/3-speed - why does it matter? Both are 1:1 in high gear.

Yes, I have have tubes. My Cooper dealer put them in. I'll not use tubes on the '54 I am restoring - it had primo original wheels. I have been driving with the radial/tubes for 9+ years.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
One more thing, I'm putting in A/C. Am I asking too much from the 235 even with the 3.55 and tall tires to pull 60-65 mph?

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
F
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,029
60-65 with the 3.55 gears isn't a problem and as drafty as these things are you shouldn't need A/C at speed, just open the vents and enjoy the breeze wink personally I think it's asking too much of a 235 to run A/C if you use it regular and want the 235 to live long

Bill


Moved over to the Passing Lane

"When we tug a single thing in nature, we find it attached to the rest of the world" ~ John Muir
"When we tug a single thing on an old truck, we find it falls off" ~ me
Some TF series details & TF heater pics
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 32
I live in SoCal and wanted the option to run A/C. Thanks for the info.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,299
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,299
Originally Posted by tclederman
I agree about the sweet-spot rpm. I run at 60-65 mph for better gas mileage (261 with 2-barrel Holley AA-1 carb used on 302/270 GMC engines).

4-speed/3-speed - why does it matter? Both are 1:1 in high gear.

Yes, I have have tubes. My Cooper dealer put them in. I'll not use tubes on the '54 I am restoring - it had primo original wheels. I have been driving with the radial/tubes for 9+ years.

I was wondering about 3 versus 4 speed myself, but not regarding high gear. I was wondering about how first gear with a 3 speed performs on steep slopes. I have some steep boat ramps and carry way too much equipment in my boat, and am worried about pulling up the ramp with 3.55 gears and 31.5 inch tires. I currently have 3.73 rearend (1970ish)and stock rims with radial tires (outside diameter unknown), and I don't have a lot of power out of the hole on steep grades. I have a 52 235 Blue Flame, BTW. Would I be better off with a 4 speed or a T-5 if I went to 3.55 gears?


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,270
The 3-speed 1st with the 3.55 is a little too high for starts on a steep slope (especially if you have a load). It is OK, otherwise.

I start in 2nd with my SM-420 4-speed, unless I want to burn rubber or unless I have a load on a hill.

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 19
B
New Guy
New Guy
B Offline
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 19
I went to 3:55 on my 41 1/2 ton. The good thing is they are tapered gears and it eliminated the wining the old gears had. I may have picked up 5 mph. I don't have a tach but can feel the comfortable speed which is about 60 mph. Thinking about a "Gear Vendor" overdrive.
Anyone have any experience wit this?

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,544
The T-5 is a good choice but they are not very good for heavy vehicles or used as a tow vehicle. How heavy is your boat?

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,299
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,299
Originally Posted by don stocker
The T-5 is a good choice but they are not very good for heavy vehicles or used as a tow vehicle. How heavy is your boat?

Its a 14 foot aluminum jon boat, about as heavy as I can safely stop with stock brakes.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0