| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (mason86, Ol'55, klhansen, Hotrod Lincoln, 32Fordpuchoptop, Ponchogl, Phak1, 1 invisible),
77
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,050 Posts1,055,676 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | Bill, the Dakota upper control arm alignment is EXACTLY like a M2 that the entire world is enamored with (except for maybe me). I agree if the bolts are not torqued that they will come loose. All bolts on suspension and rotating assemblies are supposed to be torqued. That is Mechanic 101. Maybe that part was just drilled into my head so many time over the past 40+ years. Torque value, torque sequence, then worry about socket size.
As for as the iron, I am almost positive that the Chrysler A and LA engines are slightly larger than the SBC. I know the sbc is shorter on height and length. I know that the B engines will fit in a Dakota chassis, so an SBC should without a problem.
A 6-bolt to 6-bolt adapter would solve the issue if you really want to run GM wheels. So would re-drilling the flanges.
Either way, the Dakota chassis fits the AD truck better than an S-10 chassis.
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | |
| |
| |