Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (SWEET, Donf, rfs56trk, sron48, 78buckshot, Wickedbass, JW51),
60
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,023 Posts1,055,367 Members48,420 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 564 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 564 | For an economical daily driver, it's probably a pretty good engine. I had the original 283 in my '62 Suburban. It'd been rebuilt at least twice, and had later heads on it, and was tired, but it still did a fine job. The '60-'62 truck 283s have thicker cylinder walls, and can be bored .125-over, punching it to a 4-inch bore, for 301 (302) cubic inches. My block was already bored .060-over.
The problem with rebuilding a 283 is getting pistons for it. I've heard they're tough to find, and getting a decent compression ratio for them is tough too. For a street engine on pump gas, 9.0-9.5:1 is ideal. It won't need Premium to run, and won't feel "soft" like lower compression does.
After lots and lots of thought, I simply went with a GM crate 350; it's the bottom of the rung in the GM Performance Parts catalog, rating "only" 290hp, but 290hp is stouter than most any small block from the glory days. For $1,300 ready to go (add my intake, carb, exhaust and distributor), I couldn't have built a 283 for that much. In fact, building a 283 would have been a good bit more expensive. At the same time I did mine, a friend built a 283 for his '63 truck. He's happy with it, but spent more money. I'm happy with mine, and spent less money.
I left my engine black, and dressed it with chrome 327 valve covers, the stock Rams horn headers, and a vintage Edelbrock C3B intake, modified with a PCV port in the valley pan at the back of the intake, and a port in the oil fill tube.
I was going to rebuild the truck's 283 for a drag motor in my '57 Chevy wagon gasser, basing it on a set of NOS Ross high compression pistons I found, but the pistons are only .060-over, and the block was already bored .060 and needs to go further to clean up. I'm keeping that block just in case I find a set of 302 pistons cheap. And because I don't have enough junk in my shop!
-Brad SOUTHERN FALL GABfestOctober 6 ~ Commerce, Georgia Details here!Never Pee on an Electric Fence. | | | |
Entire Thread
|
283, your thoughts???
| northdm | 12/07/2008 10:20 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| fasteddie1017 | 12/07/2008 10:40 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Don G. | 12/08/2008 12:04 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| OldSub | 12/08/2008 3:10 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| chevman32 | 12/08/2008 3:23 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Achipmunk | 12/08/2008 3:34 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| carolines truck | 12/08/2008 5:22 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Brad54 | 12/08/2008 5:46 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Hotrod Lincoln | 12/08/2008 6:08 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| 62 mark | 12/09/2008 1:43 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| hotshoe36 | 12/09/2008 4:30 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| northdm | 12/12/2008 1:15 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| 55 tractor | 12/12/2008 6:41 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Weeds | 12/12/2008 1:30 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| mapleleaf | 12/12/2008 2:17 PM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| northdm | 12/22/2008 12:17 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Project Helen | 12/22/2008 2:05 AM |
Re: 283, your thoughts???
| Fireballv8 | 12/27/2008 1:30 AM | |
| |