| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
11 members (Otto Skorzeny, ShopRag, 55shaker, klhansen, KEVINSKI, oldsteve, 66flea, Barnfind49, 51sub, LAROKE, 1 invisible),
84
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,232 Posts1,057,810 Members48,477 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 608 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 608 | How do we know there's no gain in performance or fuel mileage? Seems like losing the choke and being able to program the timing advance curve would be big fuel savers, right out of the gate. Also taking improved fuel atomization at all temperatures into account along with more precise acceleration enrichment and closed loop fuel mixture control, I don't see why you wouldn't gain a couple miles a gallon. Not gonna sit here and say that you'd automagically get to 22mpg with the EFI, but a couple MPG with greatly improved drivability would be very doable.
1965 C60 school bus | 1967 GMC 6500 school bus
| | |
| |
| |