Tom as Mike and Jerry said that camshaft will not be good for street driving. It won't idle well, it is designed to perform well at an rpm range you may infrequently ever achieve and you probably will lose low speed torque if you use it...just my expectation on what I see there on your camshaft sheet. I don't recall Lunati ever making camshafts for normal everyday use. Those two cams I mentioned will provide a smooth running engine with more torque at lower rpms. For the 235 that's a really good thing. If you look at specs for the stock 235 you'll see a couple of variations produced more torque at lower rpms and that's what I like to see. The two aspects people admire about these engines is they're durable and they produce decent torque. In fact, you can see on this page the various production differences and the results:
https://www.enginefacts.com/chevrolet235/ Focus please on the max torque and at what rpm that torque was achieved. You'll see a couple of variations reached maximum torque at 2000 rpm and then others required as much as 20% higher rpm to get there. More rpms usually means you're drinking more gasoline. Compare between 1958 and 1959-1962. There's more difference than might first meet the eye. GM just changed the camshaft to accomplish this higher torque at 2000 rpm and they discuss this on their Heritage Pages site.
As for resurfacing, the head will be resurfaced when the engine is rebuilt (as minimally as possible) to ensure it is flat and the block will also be resurfaced if it isn't flat. Not uncommon for both to need a bit of work, but .060" is on the high side, particularly if it was done to the head. What is being said is get that head off and see what compensating work was done (if any).
Some folks might remove metal to increase compression (enhance performance), but it all depends on what you're trying to accomplish and how much you know about that sort of stuff, because with this engine (as I think you're understanding) it might be a slippery slope. The 235 is an engine which was designed a long time ago and part of its limitations are a long wobbly crankshaft with only 4 main bearings, spindly piston rods that were not designed for any sort of high performance or abuse, siamesed ports and an intake manifold that breathes about as poorly as an asthmatic chain smoker. Aside from that, this is one of my favorite Chevrolet engines. But just like Barney Fife...there are limitations.
