| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,157 Posts1,056,874 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Another problem that might come up using the GMT 400 ('88-'98) chassis is the width of the frame itself, I do beleive that they are wider than the old 34" std frame older trucks use. I do know that it made aftermarket utility and dump beds a very difficult fit when they first came out, GM had to release a 2nd version of the 3500 with a 34" rear section so as not to lose the tow/utility/light dump truck industry. This might cause issues with the cab mountings bed mounting,and the running boards. Another not on the GMT 400, the frame is wider in the middle, and tapers to the rear, this will cause issues with shortening the frame.
Bill Burmeister | | | |
Entire Thread
|
53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/25/2007 8:42 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Ghostrider | 09/25/2007 9:21 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/25/2007 10:32 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/26/2007 2:01 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Grigg | 09/26/2007 4:15 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/26/2007 4:08 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/26/2007 8:38 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 12:11 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Ghostrider | 09/27/2007 1:02 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Grigg | 09/27/2007 2:22 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 2:34 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 2:49 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/27/2007 3:16 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| pablos49 | 09/28/2007 12:41 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| LONGBOX55 | 09/28/2007 4:40 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| aggie jon | 07/30/2019 4:15 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| 52Carl | 07/31/2019 1:58 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| WE b OLD | 07/31/2019 11:37 AM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Mickey3100 | 08/19/2019 2:17 PM |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Justhorsenround | 08/19/2019 3:00 PM | |
| |
| |