| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Lightholder's Dad, Otto Skorzeny, KEVINSKI, lumbersawyer, BC59, tclederman, 1 invisible),
67
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,154 Posts1,056,853 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Jim you are asking questions that might have multiple right answers, depending on what you are trying to accomplish.
Why do you want to do a frame swap?
It is much easier to change rear axles than it is to narrow a front suspension. If you look at Grigg's pictures you'll see he has narrowed a front (twice I'm aware of) and if you read AD-engineering carefully you'll decide his goal is new suspension under a stock looking truck.
What is your goal?
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | |
Entire Thread
|  
53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/25/2007 8:42 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Ghostrider | 09/25/2007 9:21 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/25/2007 10:32 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/26/2007 2:01 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Grigg | 09/26/2007 4:15 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/26/2007 4:08 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/26/2007 8:38 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 12:11 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Ghostrider | 09/27/2007 1:02 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Grigg | 09/27/2007 2:22 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 2:34 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Classic Bowtie 53 3800 | 09/27/2007 2:49 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| OldSub | 09/27/2007 3:16 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| pablos49 | 09/28/2007 12:41 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| LONGBOX55 | 09/28/2007 4:40 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| aggie jon | 07/30/2019 4:15 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| 52Carl | 07/31/2019 1:58 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| WE b OLD | 07/31/2019 11:37 AM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Mickey3100 | 08/19/2019 2:17 PM | |
Re: 53 on Full Size C1500 Chassis, Why not?
| Justhorsenround | 08/19/2019 3:00 PM | |
|
|
| |
