Is there any reason to not use 3/16 brake lines coming out of both MC ports? Tighter bend will give an inch more side clearance to transmission, and the SM420 weighs 42,000 lbs so removal even with a cherry picker one wrong sway could damage stuff. Clearance space is good. thumbs_up Originally there's a 1/4 line going across bellhousing crossmember to passenger side (RF and both rear brakes), so I'd prefer 1/4 if I had my druthers but space is critical.

FYI, picture shows MC to rear trans support crossmember clearance with the Performance Online setup.
Attachments
IMG_0818.JPEG (260.39 KB, 118 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com