Yes i've seen that article, but you can also do the same thing by offset grinding the crank and putting it in a 235 block and get 261 cubic inch out of it.
Does "do the same thing" include resulting in 292 ci?
As you guys who always move a discussion off-topic into other engines like to say,
"there is no replacement for displacement".
Thanks, Tiny_Jaime for showing us the better-known and more muscular "Cadillac 261"
