| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,148 Posts1,056,811 Members48,454 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 200 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 200 | I'll check my Repro Fentons from Patricks that I recieved a while back. They're not mounted yet. Check them against the Military 302 intake and the "H" head intake flanges that I have. The Patricks Fentons that I got from Patricks have been machined on already, so maybe they prepped the raw Casting to match the old intakes or maybe it was just to fit a GMC engine. Will post pics tonight. Jim The Fenton's will only bolt onto the Stovebolt cylinder heads out of the box, and they require extensive port welding and grinding to adapt to fit a GMC port arrangement. Also keep in mind that Patrick's has been the only one to ever have permission and a trademark agreement to us the Fenton name, and everyone else is basically stealing that right away from him in selling knockoff parts under the Fenton name.
We cannot solve our problems today using the same thinking we used when we created them! Albert Einstein
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/07/2014 11:28 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/07/2014 11:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| brokenhead | 06/07/2014 1:54 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 55shaker | 06/07/2014 3:39 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| eagleuh1 | 06/07/2014 5:45 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 12 Port | 06/07/2014 7:15 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| baldeagle | 06/07/2014 7:22 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/07/2014 10:20 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Drydock | 06/08/2014 1:31 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 3:32 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/08/2014 10:43 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 12:38 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/08/2014 3:35 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 3:56 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 5:30 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/09/2014 4:16 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/01/2014 9:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Bolter2 | 07/02/2014 12:53 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/03/2014 10:12 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Volfandt | 07/03/2014 2:28 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 07/03/2014 7:32 PM | |
| |
| |