| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Danielbolt),
164
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,149 Posts1,056,818 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | I do not know if the difference in flange thicknesses is a new thing, because I did not use Fenton headers on 216/235/261 engines "back in the day".
The Fentons that I bought in 1997 had a flange thickness that did not match the dual-carb Offenhauser intake. I had to grind the flanges on the Fentons to match the Offenhauser flanges.
The Fenton headers' flanges do match the thickness of the Fenton dual-carb intake manifold (as it should). And, the Fenton headers' flanges almost match the thickness of the original 235/261 intake manifolds (I am using original clamps but they are at a slight angle).
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/07/2014 11:28 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/07/2014 11:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| brokenhead | 06/07/2014 1:54 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 55shaker | 06/07/2014 3:39 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| eagleuh1 | 06/07/2014 5:45 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 12 Port | 06/07/2014 7:15 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| baldeagle | 06/07/2014 7:22 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/07/2014 10:20 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Drydock | 06/08/2014 1:31 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 3:32 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/08/2014 10:43 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 12:38 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/08/2014 3:35 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 3:56 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 5:30 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/09/2014 4:16 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/01/2014 9:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Bolter2 | 07/02/2014 12:53 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/03/2014 10:12 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Volfandt | 07/03/2014 2:28 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 07/03/2014 7:32 PM | |
| |
| |