Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,148 Posts1,056,809 Members48,454 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Can’t recall the exact conversation or when I saw it, but there was some reports having to do with the need to rework the Fenton headers being pushed at us today. I’ve been helping a friend get his truck back on its feet and yesterday we tackled the manifolds on the ’56 235 that’s in it. He purchased a complete exhaust kit from National Chevy Assn., which supplies William’s headers with the kit. The bottom line read, “Complete with all necessary hardware and installation instructions.” Now sitting on the bench and hanging on the side of the engine, these, like the Fenton headers look real sharp, however........looks cam be deceiving.
Number one, there were no instructions. Number two the kit did had hangers and muffler clamps but to install the Williams headers without special manifold clamps turns into a real pain in the ars. We made a call to them and the guys were nice enough to talk to but really didn’t have much to offer as far as installation advice. The gentleman that we talked to did say that the headers were made in Ohio and that they used the Fenton headers as a master for the casting. So according to that information the trouble we have with the William’s headers should also apply to the Fenton headers. The trouble: First off, the flanges are cast nearly 1/8” thicker than the stock intake, which sounds easy enough to fix by grinding a little step in the manifold clamps. The way the flange is cast, the front center clamp just barely catch the header by a about 1/32” and only on the top of the clamp. The rear center needs to be ground away right up to the hole and the flange casting actually slightly over-laps the threaded hole in the head. I won’t go into the rest of the individual clamps, but just to say that large amounts of the clamps have to be ground away to get them to fit and the clamping surfaces are then off balanced since the clamp strength comes for the compound curve that is used in its manufacture. The strain bumps in the center gasket have to be flattened in order for the Williams headers to fit flush, this makes the gasket longer and it overlaps the exhaust port by about a 1/16” on both ports, this also destroys the ability of the gasket to act independently on the two exhaust ports and single intake port.
I seem to recall posting something on this subject in the past about the fit of the ‘new’ Fenton castings. Back in the day I’d installed the original Fenton headers and they were a well-made direct bolt on part that required no rework to the castings or clamps. If they have made ‘upgrades’ to the ‘new’ version of cast headers then they should also supply a proper center gasket replacement and newly designed manifold clamps with the header. I hate to have to say this but I’ve had to do less rework from parts that came from across the Pacific than I did to these parts that came for Ohio, USA.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Last edited by Denny Graham; 06/07/2014 11:32 AM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/07/2014 11:28 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/07/2014 11:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| brokenhead | 06/07/2014 1:54 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 55shaker | 06/07/2014 3:39 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| eagleuh1 | 06/07/2014 5:45 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| 12 Port | 06/07/2014 7:15 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| baldeagle | 06/07/2014 7:22 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/07/2014 10:20 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Drydock | 06/08/2014 1:31 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 3:32 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/08/2014 10:43 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 12:38 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| tclederman | 06/08/2014 3:35 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Tiny_Jaime | 06/08/2014 3:56 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 06/08/2014 5:30 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 06/09/2014 4:16 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/01/2014 9:57 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Bolter2 | 07/02/2014 12:53 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Denny Graham | 07/03/2014 10:12 AM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Volfandt | 07/03/2014 2:28 PM |
Re: William's, a Fenton knockoff and a poor product.
| Cletis | 07/03/2014 7:32 PM | |
| |