Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,030 Posts1,055,430 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 163 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 163 | Does anyone know if the thick outer washers on a 51 3100 front engine mount with a 235 are above or below the crossmember? Imprints seem to indicate they go between the crossmember and the retainer serving as a spacer. They appear to be too beefy to be just a washer under the nut. Thanks | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | I do not have any documentation of this, but from the several dozen trucks I have swapped engines on, the thick washers are shims. They go between the mount and the top of the crossmember on the outer bolts, not under the crossmember.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 163 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 163 | | | | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 | Now you guys are making me question the installation of the front motor mount on my '54 3104. The FAM illustration < CLICK > of the mount is not very clear regarding the placement of the thick outer washers - GM #365685 3/8" ID, 1-1/4" OD, 0.187 thick. Only one washer is shown on the outer bolts. So if it goes between the retainer and the crossmember, then there is no washer between the nut and the bottom of the cross member. I always wondered why a thick washer was specified for the outer bolts. I don't understand why a spacer is needed. But to add fuel to the fire, I found this pic < CLICK > of the bottom of a retainer in a Stovebolt Tech Tip. You can see the indention from the edge of a washer on the left side of the retainer as you described. The washer would be between the retainer and the top of the crossmember. If other Bolters will supply documentation of this placement of the washers, then I'll add an update to my old post that details the installation of motor mounts on my '54.
- Lonnie My '54 3104Photos that I have shared on Stovebolt via PhotoBucket are no longer available. Please contact me if you want a photo from an old post. lonniecook [at] aol [dot] com. I sold my '54 3104 12/12/2017, but I still visit Stovebolt. OLD STUFF ... houses, furniture, cars, wine ... I love it all | | | | | Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 608 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 608 | Lonnie, The way I see that drawing if you look closely,is the arrow pointing to the washer on TOP of the crossmember,not under it,as Dave Has said above. steve sr. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 | Steve -
That's kinda what I saw today, too. That placement didn't even occur to me when I was replacing the mounts in my '54. Any idea of the purpose of the spacers?
- Lonnie My '54 3104Photos that I have shared on Stovebolt via PhotoBucket are no longer available. Please contact me if you want a photo from an old post. lonniecook [at] aol [dot] com. I sold my '54 3104 12/12/2017, but I still visit Stovebolt. OLD STUFF ... houses, furniture, cars, wine ... I love it all | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | Wouldn't it be nice to talk to the engineers on some of this stuff.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 | Denny - Did you install washers on the outer bolts between the retainer and the crossmember on your '50? Looks like I see one in this pic from your photo album ... > CLICK - Denny Graham's 1950 Front MountIf so, did you put a washer between the outer nut and the bottom of the crossmember?
- Lonnie My '54 3104Photos that I have shared on Stovebolt via PhotoBucket are no longer available. Please contact me if you want a photo from an old post. lonniecook [at] aol [dot] com. I sold my '54 3104 12/12/2017, but I still visit Stovebolt. OLD STUFF ... houses, furniture, cars, wine ... I love it all | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | The thick washer is a ‘standoff’ and sits between the frame cross member and the cushion retainer. The rubber cushion is supported between the (cover) plate and the retainer. The bolt is tightened till you have the clearance between the two as instructed in the service manual. The replacement cushions in my opinion are not as thick as the original ones or as hard and do not allow for the proper amount of crush, that makes it difficult to maintain the proper clearance between the plate and retainer: http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005338 http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005339 The outer bolts would have originally been adjusted by crushing the cushion for the correct clearance between the retainer and plate then the castle nut was locked with a cotter pin and the original castle nut did not have a washer under it. I chose to use a elastic stop nut rather than a cotter pin and put a thin washer under the nut. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005340 I talked with the people that maintained this truck from the time it was new and they had never changed the motor mounts, which were completely oil soaked and turned to mush front and rear when I got the truck in ‘05. So I’m about 95% certain that this was the way it was assembled at the factory in 1950. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Last edited by Denny Graham; 03/01/2013 2:45 PM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,232 | RATS!
I wish that I had wandered through your album when I was researching and installing the front motor mount in my '54. The pictures and notations are perfect.
I thought that I had educated myself enough to become the "motor mount professor." I had the right parts, but just not in the right location. It goes to prove that you can't take a life-long liquor salesman and woodworker and make a mechanic out of him overnight.
I still don't understand how the retainer and cushion sitting on the washers perform any differently than sitting directly on the crossmember.
Thanks for the pics and info.
- Lonnie My '54 3104Photos that I have shared on Stovebolt via PhotoBucket are no longer available. Please contact me if you want a photo from an old post. lonniecook [at] aol [dot] com. I sold my '54 3104 12/12/2017, but I still visit Stovebolt. OLD STUFF ... houses, furniture, cars, wine ... I love it all | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | My guess would be that the cushion retainer and the crossmember are not consistently flat so they used the two large area flat washers as standoffs, something like spanning a rocky river bed with a bridge. Two bridge abutments work better than one big flat bridge laying on the rocks.
Denny G
Last edited by Denny Graham; 03/01/2013 6:21 PM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | I like that explanation Denny! I have never come up with anything.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Tks Dave, means a lot comming from you. That's the only thing that makes sense to me since all of them I've seen had the thick washer, including the '54 that I have in the barn, which I bought from the original owner and was never replaced according to him. The illustration in the FAM leaves a lot to be desired. When they scanned it for the reproduction they lost a lot of the detail which I'm sure was quite clear in the original publication.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 | Why do u need the washers between the retainer and the cross member ? I'm confused | | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 | Does anyone know why u need that washer between the retainer and the crossmember ?? | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | Did you read Denny's and PreDaves's statements above? My guess would be that the cushion retainer and the crossmember are not consistently flat so they used the two large area flat washers as standoffs, something like spanning a rocky river bed with a bridge. Two bridge abutments work better than one big flat bridge laying on the rocks.
Denny G I believe mine are missing,without ill effect  | | | | | Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 246 | | | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 | The thick washer is a ‘standoff’ and sits between the frame cross member and the cushion retainer. The rubber cushion is supported between the (cover) plate and the retainer. The bolt is tightened till you have the clearance between the two as instructed in the service manual. The replacement cushions in my opinion are not as thick as the original ones or as hard and do not allow for the proper amount of crush, that makes it difficult to maintain the proper clearance between the plate and retainer: http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005338 http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005339 The outer bolts would have originally been adjusted by crushing the cushion for the correct clearance between the retainer and plate then the castle nut was locked with a cotter pin and the original castle nut did not have a washer under it. I chose to use a elastic stop nut rather than a cotter pin and put a thin washer under the nut. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005340 I talked with the people that maintained this truck from the time it was new and they had never changed the motor mounts, which were completely oil soaked and turned to mush front and rear when I got the truck in ‘05. So I’m about 95% certain that this was the way it was assembled at the factory in 1950. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL What manual is this out of??? The shop manuals I have state that the spacing is CHECKED BEFORE any weight is applied to the mount. And if it is out of spec (not enough) you are to grind the retainer. If its to large, to replace the retainer. Nothing in the manual (48-51 Truck shop manual) states to compress the cushion with torque. Also, once the shield is in place, you cannot even see the gap anymore. And the assembly drawing does not show any retainer to cross member spacers (or they are not clear... but the parts call out do not mention any spacers. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 | The thick washer is a ‘standoff’ and sits between the frame cross member and the cushion retainer. The rubber cushion is supported between the (cover) plate and the retainer. The bolt is tightened till you have the clearance between the two as instructed in the service manual. The replacement cushions in my opinion are not as thick as the original ones or as hard and do not allow for the proper amount of crush, that makes it difficult to maintain the proper clearance between the plate and retainer: http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005338 http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005339 The outer bolts would have originally been adjusted by crushing the cushion for the correct clearance between the retainer and plate then the castle nut was locked with a cotter pin and the original castle nut did not have a washer under it. I chose to use a elastic stop nut rather than a cotter pin and put a thin washer under the nut. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005340 I talked with the people that maintained this truck from the time it was new and they had never changed the motor mounts, which were completely oil soaked and turned to mush front and rear when I got the truck in ‘05. So I’m about 95% certain that this was the way it was assembled at the factory in 1950. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL What manual is this out of??? The shop manuals I have state that the spacing is CHECKED BEFORE any weight is applied to the mount. And if it is out of spec (not enough) you are to grind the retainer. If its to large, to replace the retainer. Nothing in the manual (48-51 Truck shop manual) states to compress the cushion with torque. Also, once the shield is in place, you cannot even see the gap anymore. And the assembly drawing does not show any retainer to cross member spacers (or they are not clear... but the parts call out do not mention any spacers. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 | The replacement cushions in my opinion are not as thick as the original ones or as hard and do not allow for the proper amount of crush, that makes it difficult to maintain the proper clearance between the plate and retainer: http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005338 http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005339 The outer bolts would have originally been adjusted by crushing the cushion for the correct clearance between the retainer and plate then the castle nut was locked with a cotter pin and the original castle nut did not have a washer under it. I chose to use a elastic stop nut rather than a cotter pin and put a thin washer under the nut. http://www.pbase.com/dennygraham/image/149005340 Denny Graham Sandwich, IL What manual is this out of??? The shop manuals I have state that the spacing is CHECKED BEFORE any weight is applied to the mount. And if it is out of spec (not enough) you are to grind the retainer. If its to large, to replace the retainer. Nothing in the manual (48-51 Truck shop manual) states to compress the cushion with torque. Also, once the shield is in place, you cannot even see the gap anymore. And the assembly drawing does not show any retainer to cross member spacers (or they are not clear... but the parts call out do not mention any spacers. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | What manual is this out of??? The shop manuals I have state that the spacing is CHECKED BEFORE any weight is applied to the mount. And if it is out of spec (not enough) you are to grind the retainer. If its to large, to replace the retainer. Nothing in the manual (48-51 Truck shop manual) states to compress the cushion with torque.
Also, once the shield is in place, you cannot even see the gap anymore.
And the assembly drawing does not show any retainer to cross member spacers (or they are not clear... but the parts call out do not mention any spacers. steps 1-4 http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/shop/1948_51truck/51ctsm0613.htmlower right side | | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 | That's the same thing I read... but the post said:
" The bolt is tightened till you have the clearance between the two as instructed in the service manual."
It doesn't say that at all. It says to check the clearance BEFORE TIGHTENING BOLTS and APPLYING ENGINE WEIGHT.
He then states:
The outer bolts would have originally been adjusted by crushing the cushion for the correct clearance between the retainer and plate then the castle nut was locked with a cotter pin and the original castle nut did not have a washer under it.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. If the clearance is to small, you grind the lip of the retainer. If its to large, you REPLACE IT.
Nowhere does it mention clearance washers (even in the official GM assembly drawing). Plus, as I already noted, as soon as you put on the shield, the gap is cover.. so you cannot see it.
I don't think that post could be any wronger if it tried.
Last edited by pfarber; 10/01/2013 2:00 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 4,263 | I believe he is referring to the reproduction rubber mounts in his post, they are not as thick. The top plate touches the retainer with no weight on some of the repos.
The factory assembly manual shows the special washers under the retainer See Lonnies photobucket link on the first page
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 872 | I just bought a repro rubber cushion from Chevys of the 40's. It fit exactly and was in spec. The only difference was the old rubber was 'squeezed' out around the two metal bolt bushings... most likely from improper assembly. In my search for motor mount parts I have not read about any wildly varying cushion issues, Mounts ready to paint As for the washer (365895?) In the assembly drawing it appears to be the washer on the mount to cross member bolt... but the image I have is kinda hard to read due to low resolution. Looking at the 29-57 Master Parts manual: Mount parts book page Does not show that part number. Just curious... none of the other threads I have read about the mount ever mention any spacer. | | |
| |