Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,020 Posts1,055,345 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#99977 03/20/2007 2:49 AM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 | Anyone know the amp rating of a 14 guage fusible link? Once upon a time I had a chart,,but that CRS,,& I can't seem to find one online. Brian | | |
#99978 03/20/2007 3:07 AM | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 | Brian,
I have never used a fusible link, so the research to answer this question was a learning tool for me. The bible says a 14 ga fusible link will protect 10 ga wire which has a ampacity of 25 amps....does this sound correct.
Stuart | | |
#99979 03/20/2007 3:43 AM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 | I guess that sounds about right,,I suppose that is enough. Originally the lead in wire to the fusebox on 64s was a 10 guage non-fused(!) wire. I just thought a link would be good. I might look for one those newfangled Maxipad fuses instead. Brian | | |
#99980 03/20/2007 6:03 AM | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | Stuart has the right approach. All I know about fusible links are posted Here Don't use a fuse! Fusible links are much more safe and secure.
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | |
#99981 03/20/2007 11:09 AM | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 | This should get some hair up...I think links are a pain in the butt,if you use them and one burns out there you are out in the country with the link junk,,I use breakers and spade fuses you get same protection and donot have to rewire...doc | | |
#99982 03/20/2007 11:59 AM | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | But *if* one burns out, which is a very rare occurance, it surely means that you have an *extremely* serious problem that requires more than a quick fix.
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | |
#99983 03/20/2007 12:31 PM | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,624 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,624 | I'm with "doc41". I believe that having current proctection is very important but hiding that protection under insulation and such doesn't get it with me. I've read that new car manufactures are moving away from them. I trust my ride to the same wiring techniques that protect my house and most likly yours. The fuse is to protect the wire downstream from it. The wire upstream will handle the the current necessary to "pop" the fuse and other feeder circuits. A fuse/breaker are easy to troubleshoot and replace if necessary. This "argument" extends to the redundant relay issue with cooling fans and such. If one relay of two in parallel feeding a cooling fan goes out there is no way to trouble shoot it short of removal and testing. I don't run two cooling fan relays, two brake light switches, two relays for the headlights, etc. We're not flying the space shuttle here.
Six volt guy living in a twelve volt world
| | |
#99984 03/20/2007 1:08 PM | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: May 2004 Posts: 191 | You know, it is simple enough to carry a spare fusible link in the glove box, just like a fuse or two, and with a little planning, to set up your wiring so that access to the link is not a PITA. As for the multiple relays for the cooling fan, the reasoning is not for ease of troubleshooting, but to prevent a single relay failure from rendering your engine toast. Small aircraft have had redundancy for decades. To each his own, but I've invested far too much money, sweat and time into my truck to pass up adding a $4 relay. Once the reasoning was explained to me, it seemed a no-brainer. | | |
#99985 03/20/2007 1:37 PM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 | I dunno, GM used nothing-I just thought a fusible link would be some protection. My 79 Ford has them, in 28 yrs now never a trouble w/them. I planned on adding the cooling fan wiring separate from the rest of the truck, & the A/C fan has its own power supply also. Brian | | |
#99986 03/20/2007 2:28 PM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 144 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 144 | If you look at some of the latest new vehicles they have illiminated the fuseable links and instead installed a seperate fuse panel in the engine compartment for heavier wiring such as lights, air cond,electric fan,starter etc and any other circuit above 30 amp with fuses and circuit breakers. Even the battery has a fuse to protect the whole system.If you've got the room and don't want to keep it original I think that might the easier way to go.The only problem I've ever seen with that system is when your boosting the battery you have to make sure you get the cables correct the first time otherwise you blow the fuse. Bob T | | |
#99987 03/20/2007 2:55 PM | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | If you ask me, the newer vehicles have illiminated a lot of things ... like illiminating any possibility for owners to fix *anything* themselves. I don't drive a '54 Chevy pickup for nothin'! 
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | |
#99988 03/21/2007 1:22 PM | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 | So can anyone tell us why a link is better protection than a spade fuse????doc | | |
#99989 03/21/2007 1:39 PM | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | I guess you didn't read the info from the link I posted? Here's an excerpt for you: "... fusible links never fry unless there's a very serious problem that needs your immediate attention (like a major power wire grounding against metal!); a problem that a circuit breaker or in-line fuse could mask well enough to have you finding your car in flames. Fusible links are the safest way to protect your electrical system and keep your vehicle from an electrical fire.
An in-line fuse on a 30-amp electric fan circuit (as I discovered) won't last very long. When that fan kicks in, it's more likely to pull 60 amps (initially) than 30 and after a dozen times or so that in-line fuse will give up it's ghost and burn out -- it's a gradual breakdown that occurs.
Just like an in-line fuse, a 30-amp circuit breaker is also subject to wearing out and eventually frying ... it just takes longer.
A fusible link will never wear out. It will only burn out protecting your vehicle from bursting into flames due to a serious short that needs your immediate attention -- nothing else is gonna do that for you. You can see many fusible links in older cars, still doing their job after 20 years or more."
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | |
#99990 03/23/2007 3:14 AM | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,624 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,624 | Another point of view...Alan, I did read your link. I'm impressed by your passion for the link over fuses or breakers. As to your arguements for links due to operational cycles and the over current on start up of certain electricial devices found in our rides....well I not totally convinced. If you read the fine print on such things as fuses and breakers you will notice they are heat activated as are links. They have engineered into them a delay for that higher than normal start up current. Generally 125% of their maximum current capacity for X period of time. As I'm sure you know, anytime you power up a circuit that is not purely resistive you will get an inductive or capacitive kick. Ever notice how the lights dim in some cases when you turn your air compressor or A/C on, Well, that's the kick. Your shop fuses or breakers hold that and keep right on ticking. I not against links. I will have several on my ride when it is finished but I also still believe in fuses and breakers.
Six volt guy living in a twelve volt world
| | |
#99991 03/23/2007 3:42 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The same laws of physics apply to the fusable material in an inline fuse as a fusable link. If your fuse is failing from fatigue you may be using the wrong fuse.
If you replace it with a slow-blow device you have now changed the weakest part of the system to something else, perhaps the very part the fuse was intended to protect.
I've never been a fan of fusable links, but more important is to understand why you would use one versus why you would use a simple fuse or circuit breaker. I'm pretty sure the major manufacturers used fusable links because they are cheaper to make and install than big fuses. It doesn't take much of a savings to motivate Detroit to do something cheaper.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#99992 03/23/2007 4:14 AM | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 | My unsolicited opinion is that even if fusible links protect for longer than fuses without degrading, you can't look at one and know that it failed as easily as you can a fuse, and changing a fuse on a "dark and stormy night" is easier than changing a fusible link to get you home. | | |
#99993 03/23/2007 5:40 AM | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2003 Posts: 1,271 | Originally posted by beltfed: I not against links. I will have several on my ride when it is finished but I also still believe in fuses and breakers. Same here. Certainly, I wouldn't use links for *everything* ...
~~ Alan Horvath 1954 Chevy PickupSinging his praises in thePassing Lane | | |
#99994 03/27/2007 3:21 PM | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 427 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 427 | | | |
#99995 03/27/2007 4:11 PM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 | Well guys, I went w/a fusible link,,plenty of wire extra for future repairs if needed. GM used nothing before the fusebox, but I thought it would be a good idea(there's 10+ feet from battery to fusebox). I had a nice 40 amp breaker on old black truck, but I cannot find it, & I really couldn't figure a way to mount/wire a Maxi fuse w/o it looking ghetto. The fusible link is easy. Brian | | |
#99996 04/05/2007 1:08 AM | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 395 | dosen't it all come to what one wants,,,also one has to be smart enough to know there is a problem in either system..I have seen links removed and wire installed also gum wrappers around fuses and wire jumpers in place of spades so it all comes down to smarts,,,yes???doc | | |
#99997 04/05/2007 11:29 PM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 | http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/hweb1.pdf 18ga. Fusible Link protects 14ga. or heavier wired systems 16ga. Fusible Link protects 12ga. or heavier wired systems 14ga. Fusible Link protects 10ga. or heavier wired systems 12ga. Fusible Link protects 8ga. or heavier wired systems Notice in the table above that there is always a four number size difference between the Fusible Link wire gauge size, and the size of wire going out to the rest of the circuit. (And with wire gauge sizes, the larger number is for a smaller diameter–as with shotgun barrels, the 20 gauge bore diameter is smaller than the 12 gauge bore diameter.)
Jim & Caroline The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense." Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
| | |
| |