Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,090 Posts1,056,024 Members48,432 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 | I'm replacing the kingpins on a 1956 half-ton. I understand that the bushings are the floating type and are designed to move around (somewhat) in their bores in the steering knuckle. From my reading here, I see that some guys prefer to fasten them in place with Loctite or something similar. What's the advantage to this? Also, I understand that the bushings themselves do not need reaming and the new pins should fit with no trouble. Is this right? I got my parts at LMC, for what it's worth.
1956 Chevy 3200
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 | Loctite between the outside of the bushing where it mates with the steering knuckle will prevent movement in this area preventing wear of the knuckle if you were to neglect to properly lubricate the kingpins. The only part that is supposed to move is the kingpin inside the inner surface of the bushing. Generally when a kingpin is in need of replacement, it is due to lack of grease on the kingpin, causing it to seize to the inside of the bushing, therefore forcing the outer surface to turn on the inside of the steering knuckle, causing damage to the steering knuckle.
Last edited by 52Carl; 11/20/2013 12:33 AM.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 | Thanks, Carl. But as I understand it, they were designed to "float," correct? Also, can anyone tell me if the inside diameter of the bushing needs honing? Everything I've read says the bushings are produced to finished dimensions and need no reaming or honing. I took the parts to the machinist today assuming the bushings would have to be pressed in and then reamed. He called me back to tell me the bushings were too small for the steering knuckles. Turns out he's never heard of floating bushings and he's been in business for 37 years. I think he still doesn't believe me!
Last edited by joeflanagan; 11/20/2013 1:19 AM.
1956 Chevy 3200
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Yes, on 1/2 tons, the bushings are designed to float. Also, on 1/2 ton, they are already at the finished diameter, no reaming necessary. Here's the Manual Page explaining it. The page is from the '55 manual, but '56 is the same.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 | Thanks Bill. I have that page bookmarked already. I'm thinking of just letting the bushings float as designed, unless one of you can convince me I ought to use Loctite and fix them in place.
1956 Chevy 3200
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Joe,
If he has only been in the business for 37 years, he can be forgiven for not knowing about floating king pin bushings that were used on 1/2 ton trucks up to at least 54 years ago.
When I have a snug fit of the bushings to the knuckle, I do not use Loctite. I grease them every year (or, every 1,000 miles).
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | The problem with not using loctite on the bushings is the wear in the spindles(unless you are using NOS spindles). Even with new bushings you will end up with play between the bushing and spindle when done giving play in the front end. By loctiting the bushings in place you end up with a slop free front end. If you decide to loctite them in make sure you put a pin through the two bushings while the loctite sets up to keep them inline.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | If they float free then at some point down the road you'll have worn out bores in the spindle and be looking for replacement spindles. Fixing them in place now all that will wear are the replaceable bushing and pin.
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Every time the subject of "full floating bushings" comes up it always seems to cause confusion. Most of us are not used to a bushing that is not pressed into on member so the second one can rotate freely in the bushing. The bushings should be a snug fit in the steering knuckle, but not snug enough to keep them from pressing thru when lightly oiled with thumb pressure. When all the parts are new and on size the bushing should be free to rotates in the steering knuckle and around the king pin. If they were manufactured to the proper dimensions then there is no need for any reaming or honing, they should slip together snugly when lightly oiled, assuming all the parts are spotlessly clean and there are no burrs scratches or high spots on any of the bearing surfaces. The kit comes with new bushings and new pins so they should be fine. The problem comes in to play with the steering knuckle. If you are lucky, or should I say, extremely lucky there will not be any wear in the bore and the bushing would press thru with thumb pressure. If you are like 99% of the population then the steering knuckle will show some wear. That is why the manual specifies reaming the bore for a .010" oversize bushing, which should still float freely in the bore. The quick fix that Dave was referring to is to Locktite the stock size bushing which comes in the kits in the worn steering knuckle's bore. Locktite thread locker such as 242 or similar will not work for that. Locktite retaining compound like their 620 might work if the clearance isn't to much. But by doing that you have just re-engineered your full floating king pin bushings to a semi-floating design. I don't know if .010" over bushing are available. If the bushings that came with the kit will not slip into the steering knuckle than I suppose they could be over size. In which case the machinist should be instructed to hone the steering knuckle bore to a snug slip fit, meaning a few ten thousands of an inch.
That's the way I've always interpreted the design, hope it helps clear things up.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 | Thanks, everyone, for your responses. I'm going to get the parts back from the machine shop and see how well it all goes together as designed. I haven't had a chance to check the fit of the bushings myself. Thanks for all the advice.
Joe
1956 Chevy 3200
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 | I just checked the specs for over-size kingpin kit at Classicparts and the outside diameter of the bushings is the same as those for the standard kingpins. The over-size is in the kingpin and the inside diameter of the bushing only. So my question has always been, why would anyone ever need this over-sized kingpin/bushing? If the wear is between the kingpin and the inside surface of the bushings, why not just replace with the standard kingpin/bushing kit? What am I missing? (I am prone to missing stuff.) Also, where does one find over-sized outside diameter bushings?
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | The over-sized king pin is common because it was common for the loose-bushings-pins to wear/enlarge the holes in the axle. The over-sized pin will fit tight in an axle hole that was reamed to the over-sized diameter of that pin. Often .020 over-sized pin-sets are available.
What is needed is a set with over-sized king pin diameter and over-sized outer diameter of the bushing.
Someone recently posted the MOOG part number for such a replacement set.
This discussion arises fairly regularly. The wallowed-out knuckle-journals seem to be almost as common as wallowed-out holes in axles?
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Someone recently posted the MOOG part number for such a replacement set. Not sure who originally posted it (might have been me, I don't recall for sure), but I do have a Moog catalog handy. Seems there's 3 different numbers; 8444B for '55-'56, 8457B for '57-Early '58, 8468 for Late '58-'59. Not sure what the exact differences are, the dimensions for the pins themselves is the same for all 3 sets, .8660 x 5.312". Something I did not mention in my earlier post, I did secure my bushings in the knuckles with Locktite 640.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Guess it wasn't me. Looks like that thread covers Advance design, which uses different part numbers from the Task Force.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | If the wear is minor Bill, your choice of the 620 is fine, but it's a medium viscosity retainer. I'd use it where the inner or outer race of a bearing was supposed to be a press fit and was slightly loose for one reason or another. If someone is going down to their local bearing supply to buy a bearing retainer compound for a badly worn bore, I'd recommend the 620 simply because it's a higher viscosity and will fill a larger gap, like up to an 1/8" on the total diameter. Also before they ring you up it wouldn't hurt to pick up a primer for that compound, #7649. All that being said, these retaining compounds are just plastic and I'm not sure just how much hammering they will take before they get knocked out of place. I mean look at the damage that was done to the steel, no way plastic is going to take that much stress. The load on the king pins is a bending load, and they take an orful beating which is evidenced by the common need for replacement. Bearing retainers are mainly compounded for use where the bearing or bearing race is supporting a radial load. I gotta say that from my point of view using a bearing retaining compound in this application is just a quick and dirty temporary fix, like if you wanted to dump the vehicle on someone and didn't what to spend the cash to do it right. If it were me, the only repair that I would trust would be reaming to take an over size bushing. Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Last edited by Denny Graham; 11/22/2013 12:40 PM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Denny, Not for these old trucks, but plastic king pin bushings are common. I'm not a fan of them but that's what's in my front axle (mid 90's GM) because that is all that I could find at time of rebuild. So, my thinking is if plastic bushings themselves don't get pounded out, and that's the wearing surface as well. Then using something like Loctite 660 which is designed to fill a gap and support a bearing/bushing is OK. All it needs to do is fill the space and stay in place, the load and wear is in the pin and bushing, all the plastic needs to do is not squish. So the filler needs to be good in compression, which I expect it is, that's it's job.
I understand your hesitation but personally feel the 660 and similar filler/bearing retainers is a good fix for moderately worn spindle bores as well as a good way to prevent wearing out spindles even if the bushings fit as new, better to lock them in place.
Best I can figure the full floating king pin bushing was simply a quick cheap way to assemble axles on an assembly line. I see absolutely no advantages in life and function. To do it right (as nearly all other king pins and bushings are) they should have pressed bushings in and reamed them to fit the king pins.
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 1,901 | When I was looking for the KP's for my 58 I found RockAuto handy, as they showed the actual inner and outer dimensions for the different pins available.
Give me ambiguity or give me something else
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | Your reasoning about the assembly line labor savings is as good as any I've heard Grigg, and it might have entered into the equation. It does however give you twice the bearing surface of a fixed bushing, which could reduce the friction giving you easier steering, could even result in less wear than a single surface bearing all of the stress.
You know me Grigg, the eternal doubting Dennis. I sort of doubt that any of anaerobic compounds, resulting in a cast filler, could stand the loads imposed on the king pins, especially upon impact with poor roads surfaces. Just taxing down a smooth asphalt runway before take off at only a few miles per hour with my 750lb. Pitts special would peg the recording G-meter at over nine G's. I'd shudder to think what sort of impact loads the front end of a 3500 lb. vehicle would encounter at fifty or sixty mph but I'd bet it would be well into the double 'G' figures. The plastics used in your newer truck is most likely an injection molded material which gets much of it's strength from the long molecular chains as opposed to a cast part. Probably something like a "T-series" resin which can handle pressures up to 32,000 pounds per square inch and temperatures up to 619F. The Loctite 620 has a shear strength of about 3500 psi. Not familiar with the "660" but there is a Loctite 680 high strength that has a shear strength of 4000psi, but it's only designed to fill a loose slip fit no more than .015".
Have to take a look at Rock Auto's site Caso, I'd like to add those dimensions to my reference file, thanks for pointing that out.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | All I can add Denny is, I have been using Loctite on king pin bushings for at least 30 years with no come backs.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 814 | Well, I finally finished this job. I used a sleeve retaining compound by Permatex. I made that choice before seeing all of the back and forth here. We shall see what happens. Only real difficult thing I ran into was that the new tie rod ends were an absolute #%#^ to thread on. Seems like the inside diameter was slightly smaller than the outside diameter of the tie rod. I made it work but man it takes some torque to thread those things on. Everything feels nice and tight but I got a weird steering thing going on that I'll talk about in a separate thread.
1956 Chevy 3200
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | Denny, I always use high strength red Loctite. Right now I am using Red #271 permanent. This is when using standard outside diameter NOS full floating bushings in worn spindles. As far as GM's thought on this, I will have to add this to my long list of questions I will ask the engineers when I meet them, LOL. The replacement king pin sets I have seen are press in style and need to be reamed. I happen to have a lifetime supply of NOS king pins and bushings to use.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 523 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 523 | I recently had the same experiance - my shop was also a little surprised. I believe that the shop manual recommended installing the bushing with anti-sieze compound.
Bob
BobS46
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,275 | So, the only time one needs an over-size kingpin for a full floater is when the axle hole is worn?
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Correct for any kingpin; the "oversize" is to correct worn out bore in the axle. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | That is correct.
If you have significant looseness in the bushing journals in the steering knuckle/spindle, you have another problem that is not solved by using the over-sized kingpin.
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | | | |
| |