Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,164 Posts1,056,966 Members48,458 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 | Hi all,
I would like to use 3/16" cu-ni brake lines for my 1950 AD. From what I have seen online,they specify to use a black oxide fitting with this type of line. Can I use the standard metal brake line fittings or does it have to be Black oxide? The fitting are 7/16" thread correct?
Thanks, skipper | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,101 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,101 | I replaced all the lines on a 55 3600 about 6 years ago and used the Copper-Nickel with standard fittings. It is still working great with no problems. I don't recall it being an issue at the time. If I remember correctly the vendor that provided the line also furnished the fittings. Fred
1956 3100 Pickup/Red/350/3sp OD/PS/Disc Brakes 1957 Bel Air Sport Coupe/Red/355/TH350/PS/Disc Brakes 2017 Silverado LT Single Cab SB/Black/5.3/6 Speed Trans 1947 Willys CJ2A w/F-Head engine
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | I've used a lot of it and like stainless tube nuts, but have used many standard tube nuts as well with no problem. Have not seen black oxide treated nuts, I'm sure they're fine but not necessary.
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 | Ok, great thanks for the input. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 | Another question, I just measure several different pieces of my old brake lines. Everyone one of them has an OD of .25" and not 3/16". Could it had come from the factory like that I thought all the line were 3/16" Should I go with 1/4" or with 3/16" any benefits one way or the other? I | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | What size truck? I don't have a 1/2 ton but I think they may have used some 3/16"? On my larger trucks they are all 1/4" front to back, no 3/16".
Typically drum brakes on a pickup truck use 1/4". In some cases a truck with small wheel cylinders use 3/16" Typically disc brakes on a pickup use 3/16". Sometimes 1/4" is used going to the rear axle where it then splits to two 3/16" lines, either disc or small drums.
The real answer is you need enough fluid flow to actuate the brakes quickly. On the other hand oversize lines contribute slightly to a spongy brake feel.
Simple answer is to use what the factory used for the original vehicle if you have the original brakes. Or if you have unoriginal brakes you should use the size lines that the factory used on whatever vehicle the brakes came from.
Grigg
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 | My truck is a 1/2 ton AD. I have coverted to disc brakes up front. So I would be ok with 3/16 all around? | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | So you'll be using a proportioning valve, the brass GM kind with 2 inlets, 2 outlets for the front, and one outlet for the rear?
If I were doing it I'd use two lines 1/4" between MC and proportioning valve if I could. Then use 1/4" from valve to rear axle hose. Use 3/16" for each front brake line. On the rear axle 3/16" only if that's the original size, or if originally 1/4" I'd use all 1/4" for it again.
I'm sure you could get by with other methods, the one above is what I think is best/right, might not be what everyone else has done. I could also be off some; if so I'd like to hear a better way of doing it with good reasons why.
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | The Size of the line should have nothing to do with the pressure applied to the cylinders as long as it can deliver the volume. You could use a 3/4" conduct to deliver the fluid and it would still apply the same pressure, as far as that goes, even a 1/8" line would again, deliver the same pressure only not filling the cylinders as fast. The reason we see a couple of different size lines on an AD goes back to that same old thing we've run into many times in the past, if they could save a few penny's on each truck it was more profit for GM stock holders. If it were me I'd just make it simple and standardize it by running 1/4" lines through the whole system that way all the nuts would be the same and you would be guaranteed or having plenty of fluid volume to all cylinders.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Depending on the proportioning valve and other components in your brake system you may not have the option of using 1/4" line if the inverted flare fitting(s) won't accept the smallest 1/4" tube nut size. The two front brake ports on the valve may be an example where 3/16" is the max size?
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 261 | I did not get a chance to have a look at my MC and propotioning valve set up. I am using the POL brake kit with the dual MC. I try and check tomorrow what size line it has. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 725 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 725 | One fine, visual chart on the fittings, Grigg! Thanks! | | |
| |