The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Otto Skorzeny, IHPWR, GMCJammer51, Hotrod Lincoln, 1 invisible), 560 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,296
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#906983 12/29/2012 7:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
i have a 47.1, 46 design pu factory frame from motor mounts back. the front end & m. mounts crosmember is 1975 blazer 4x4 .
i plan/ thinking to put a 4.3 with overdrive& transfercase from 1988 4x4 s10
the front tire track is 7" wider each side than the fenders so concedering a 81 toyota front axle as i want to keep it 4x4 the toy uses 6 hole chev wheels, & i got a few lawing around .
i want to use as dayly driver to & from work as i work in a restoration shop & it might draw more work in ?
so hows the 4.3 for power & gas milage pulling a full size rig any one driving one of these cool pu with a 4.3
i will want to use a carb as wireing is not my thing


just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
mike47.1 #906984 12/29/2012 8:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
I don't know about mileage or power, but I'm thinking this would be a great time to learn about electrical. The injection would be much, much better. It would also give you more indespensibility at work.

mike47.1 #906986 12/29/2012 8:19 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
from what i read in the s10 forum a eld 2114 intake w/ 4 barrel & mild cam gives 42 HP over the injection with out the headakes of the computer


just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
mike47.1 #907002 12/29/2012 10:08 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
i run a 4.3 with 700r4 trans in a 4 door 1946 plymouth, i get 18-20 mpg. i converted mine to a 500 cfm carb from factory tbi( it was shot) dyno's at 203hp. more than enough power for around town and 80+ mph on the freeway.

daren


1952 GMC 1-Ton
1946 plymouth
1947 ford
custom builder
http://www.doublegcustoms.com
mike47.1 #907083 12/29/2012 2:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,733
Since your intended front axle/diff is Toyota I assume your going to use the rear axle form a Toy too. I doubt you'd find the gear ratios the same as the S10 if I understand you correctly.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
mike47.1 #907160 12/29/2012 6:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
the carburetor is much more trouble than that computer will ever be. I was just thinking it could be used as an opportunity to learn something else. Maybe it is because I am contemplating EFI for my 216 which someone here has done (on a 235 though) already, and has nearly all his information in one of these forum posts. And the fact that I don't like having machines I can't figure out.

darenhg72 #907301 12/30/2012 2:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by darenhg72
i run a 4.3 with 700r4 trans in a 4 door 1946 plymouth, i get 18-20 mpg. i converted mine to a 500 cfm carb from factory tbi( it was shot) dyno's at 203hp. more than enough power for around town and 80+ mph on the freeway.

daren
thats what im thinking thanks
did you use the eld 2114 intake
what carb

Last edited by mike47.1; 12/30/2012 2:26 AM.

just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
brokenhead #907302 12/30/2012 2:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by brokenhead
the carburetor is much more trouble than that computer will ever be. I was just thinking it could be used as an opportunity to learn something else. Maybe it is because I am contemplating EFI for my 216 which someone here has done (on a 235 though) already, and has nearly all his information in one of these forum posts. And the fact that I don't like having machines I can't figure out.

so how do you mean the computer is less trouble


just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
53moneypit #907303 12/30/2012 2:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by 53moneypit
Since your intended front axle/diff is Toyota I assume your going to use the rear axle form a Toy too. I doubt you'd find the gear ratios the same as the S10 if I understand you correctly.

yes i still need to check out the ratios
was concedering a step lower than the s10 due to the extra weight, not sure


just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
mike47.1 #907305 12/30/2012 2:22 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 27
thank you for the thoughts /responces gives me a lot to concider


just sand it a little more
47 1st series pu 4x4
mike47.1 #907318 12/30/2012 6:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
don't remember the intake # offhand. I used the one recommended to me by summit racing. actually, i think edelbrock only makes one manifold for that engine. it cost me $119 for it, that i know.

daren


1952 GMC 1-Ton
1946 plymouth
1947 ford
custom builder
http://www.doublegcustoms.com
mike47.1 #907327 12/30/2012 8:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,847
I have driven at least 300,000 miles in EFI cars and changed a couple of fuel filters, while carbureted cars don't run well when cold, and are inefficient. Had to rebuild them a few times (not really too much, but more than once) Whereas the EFI just runs. I know virtually nothing about the transplanting of one of these engines into something else, but some of the EFI engines have a stand alone system, so if you get all the components out of a donor vehicle, it is pretty much a plug and play. All you need to do is find someplace to put the boxes. It would take a little research, but you would be learning a valuable lesson all the while. You could actually meet current emission standards (or at least current at the time of the donor engine build date)at the same time. which doesn't matter to many people but if it is that simple I see no reason not too. They are getting incredible power out of cars now days, with insanely high MPG for the amount of power they are putting out and don't emit much more than a little C02 and water, (that may not be really correct, but you get the idea.) Not to mention the EPA will probably start requiring something like this one day anyway. BUT if you change everything over, you will have to buy a manifold and carburetor on top of everything else and if the intake setup for one of these is anything like my mustang, it will eat up the better part of a $1000 bill. Like I said earlier there is some fella on on this forum (stovebolter)that did up a 235, I can't remember when, but there was about 15 pages of info, also someone may have posted a tech tip. Go to other forums, (I apologize in advance) the HAMB, and chevytalk are a couple, they have many discussions about this sort of thing as well. If you are like me and are about as computer literate as Ogg the cave man it seems like a daunting undertaking, but bit by bit it can be done. OH I didn't see the $119 for the manifold till I finished this, but the carb is about $400 (at least mine was)

Last edited by brokenhead; 12/30/2012 8:54 AM.
mike47.1 #907352 12/30/2012 10:47 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,886
Have you weighed both trucks? I would bet the S10 is pretty close to the same as your old truck. They are big, but its just sheet metal, they don't have all the hidden crash bars and such as newer trucks have.

I would go EFI if I had a choice, for sure if I had the donor already.

Wind drag will kill more fuel milage then weight will.

mike47.1 #907382 12/30/2012 12:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
4
'Bolter
'Bolter
4 Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
The best investment you could make is to buy the painless TBI harness, and the wiring on that is done for you. You can get edelbrock intakes for the TBI, and a chip, and then there's nothing to worry about, the computer takes care of the tuning.

Most of these 4.3's in the Blazers and S-10's get really poor fuel mileage (worse than a same-year 350 in a full-size truck). In the half-tons they can get mid-20's, not sure why that is.


1946 GMC Pickup - S-10 Frame, 455 Buick, TH400, original patina.

My 46 GMC on Photobucket
mike47.1 #907397 12/30/2012 1:29 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
GM builts thousands of full size trucks and vans with the 4.3 engine in them so your size and weight is not a problem. All the 4.3 1986 vans that I worked on came with the 4bbl Quadrajet which is probably as good a combination carb as there is. If you keep your foot out of it and run just on the very small primaries it gets decent (but not great) mileage. Kick open the huge secondaries and they scoot hard as the gas gauge plummets.


Evan

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.133s Queries: 14 (0.029s) Memory: 0.6631 MB (Peak: 0.7686 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 20:55:24 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS