The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 105 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,024
Posts1,055,395
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#876254 08/20/2012 7:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 59
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 59
Hey guys I need to replace a cylinder head for my 57-62 235. whats the difference between a 3836850 gm 5 and a 3836848 gm4 cylinder heads?

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
The difference is 2.

Hahahahahaha!

The 848 head should be higher compression, about 8 to 1 I think. Other than that, I think they are samsies. If I'm wrong, somone will come along and say so.


Christopher
1950 1-Ton
"Rochester"
In the Gallery
In the DITY Gallery

1949 GMC Panel Truck
1926 Model TT Truck
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
It looks like the 3836850 head is a 261 head, and the 3836848 is a 56-63 235 head.

The "848" head produces higher compression. The 261 head has extra coolant circulation holes in it. You could use it but I'd use a 261 head gasket with it (to seal off the extra holes).

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
Originally Posted by tclederman
You could use it but I'd use a 261 head gasket with it (to seal off the extra holes).
I'm sure Tim means 235 gasket.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Do you think a 235 gasket, Dave? I go with your knowledge.

I was thinking that the metal rings at the coolant holes in the 261 gasket would make a positive seal from head to block?


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
M
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,388
See, look how smart they are!


Christopher
1950 1-Ton
"Rochester"
In the Gallery
In the DITY Gallery

1949 GMC Panel Truck
1926 Model TT Truck
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
I see what you are saying Tim. I think either would work fine. One may want to put a little sealer around those holes.
A 261 gasket has a much larger sealing ring around the combustion area due to the larger bore. Used on a 235 gives a dead area and some loss of compression. The dead area may not make much difference on these old engines but on emission engines it would cause increased emissions as unburned fuel would be caught in that area.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,747
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,747
I'd use the 235 gasket. Without corresponding holes in the block, the steam holes won't have anything to line up with. No harm, no foul. The 848 head would be a better choice, if you've got both numbers to choose from.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Thanks for the reasoning, Dave

I fully agree with you, Jerry - the 848 head being a better choice (If berts53 has a choice).

I'll eventually put an 848 head on my 261. I'll drill the coolant holes in that head and use the 261 gasket.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,747
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,747
Tim, when you drill that 848 head, be sure to angle the holes slightly. The coolant passages in the head the holes are supposed to line up with aren't exactly in line with a hole drilled perpendicular to the head gasket surface. The holes are angled away from the combustion chamber a little.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
Success when drilling straight in is entirely dependent on core shift. More info here:

http://www.inliners.org/ubbthreads/...PSESSID=5431feccbd38ff4e7d08c25aa4811a0d



1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod
You Tube
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 59
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 59
Thanks for the info guys. They looked exactly the same. Unfortunately there is a crack in the number 4 cylinder in the same place on the 848 head. I gotta keep looking I guess.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0