The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 116 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,105
Posts1,056,541
Members48,448
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
I tore down the distributor and gave everything a thorough cleaning. It actually seems to be in pretty good shape but I'm still replacing a few of the wear items including the main shaft and the drive gear with NOS parts, along with the cap, points & condenser.

The question I have is about a fibre "plug" as it's called in the Master Parts Books. It's inserted through the port where the grease cup is located and there's a spring to put tension on it against the shaft. What is/was this for? It sure cut a groove into the shaft and it's "seated" in with a pretty good curve to match the shaft. I have parts books from 1950, 1952, and 1954. The plug, #1869303, group# 2.364, is listed in the '50 and '52 books but is gone by the '54 edition. Is this something, along with the spring, that I should just leave out as it seems the engineers determined in later years it was no longer needed? I'd hate to put it in and cut another groove in my nice new shaft.

Also, are there any opinions on NOS vacuum advance modules? I found one still sealed in it's original box. Has anyone had any experiences good or bad using a roughly 50 year old part in this application? My concern is the diaphragm. I'm not sure if it's probably dry rotted or, if they're typically good being they haven't been exposed to the harsh environment found under the hood. The new one's just look a little too shiny and tinny but, I know performance is more important than originality/appearance.

Thanks,
Shawn


Shawn

1950 3600 Pickup, 1958 Plymouth Belvedere
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,115
|My take on the little disc is that it stops all the grease from running out onto the shaft. Every time the cup is tunred in a bit, a little grease is pushed past the disc.

You can test the vacuum advance by applying some vacuum to it.


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Thanks Truckernix. I wasn't clear on the vacuum advance part. I found one for sale so I don't have it yet. I'm just trying to decide if it's worth spending the money on it or if it's likely not good and should just go with a re-pop.


Shawn

1950 3600 Pickup, 1958 Plymouth Belvedere
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
In my opinion the disc and spring is designed to keep slight side pressure on the shaft. Any play in the shaft effects point gap/dwell.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0