| |
BUSY BOLTERS Are you one?  The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,282 Members48,100 | | Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025 | | | | Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 10 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 10 | Hi all, I have a 1960 c10, which previous owner has lowered and i am going to bring back up to stock. Several catologs/sources supply 1963-72 springs, others say 1960-1972 as same part number, I am wonderign why/if there is a differance? Just slightly different height? completly different mountign ?
Thanks for any insight... jamie | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 426 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 426 | There was a different frame used on the 60-62 models versus the 63-66. The rear ends were different between the two models also, as were the shock mounting location, spring locations and the trailing arms mounting locations. In the research Ive done, the rear springs from 60-72 are interchangeable. The front end of the 60-62 used torsion bars, so no springs there.
Last edited by jon1963; 04/02/2012 7:32 PM.
| | |
|
|
| |
