| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,181 Posts1,057,152 Members48,464 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2009 Posts: 220 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2009 Posts: 220 | Hello!
I'm in the process of putting a rear end back together for the open driveline/T5 swap for my '53 3100. I'm using the rear end out of a '56 Chevy wagon. An old-timer at a local machine shop confirmed the year as '55 or '56 based on the configuration of the axle bearings and hold down plates.
Anyway, I just had the drums turned. The machined surface measures between 2 1/8 and 2 1/4" inches wide. The old brake shoes that came with the rear are 2" in width. However, the guys at NAPA say that the catalog shows that the rear brake shoes are supposed to be 1.75” in width, although ’58 – ’70 used 2” shoes in the rear.
Is it normal for the inside surface of a drum to be slightly wider than the surface of the shoe? In this case it’s 1/8” per side or less.
Could someone have replaced the original 1.75 drums with 2” drums, and if so, would that present any problems?
Lastly, I want to retrofit the rear brakes with self-adjusting hardware. Will doing so with the original style brake shoes present any problems?
Thanks…
Chris
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | yes the shoes should be 1.75, on the rear, the car had 2" on the front, someone got confused - the 2" might work OK but the fronts do more of the work .... for self adjusters with the earlier brake configuration yer on yer own  Bill | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,102 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,102 | 55-57 cars and trucks used the same shoes front & rear. 2" in front and 1.75" rear. The later cars and trucks used a wider shoe in the rear but the backing plate was different to accomodate it. The front & rear drums were the same width on 55-58 cars and 55-59 trucks. The only difference being 5 lug vs 6 lug. Forget the self adjusters. Fred
Last edited by rfs56trk; 03/14/2012 5:16 PM.
1956 3100 Pickup/Red/350/3sp OD/PS/Disc Brakes 1957 Bel Air Sport Coupe/Red/355/TH350/PS/Disc Brakes 2017 Silverado LT Single Cab SB/Black/5.3/6 Speed Trans 1947 Willys CJ2A w/F-Head engine
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 278 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 278 | Any GM self adjusters for 11" drum brakes should work. I used ones from the back of a 71 chevy 1/2 ton on the front of 51 chevy 1/2 ton. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | You will need later model shoes to use the self adjusters. I wouldn't use self adjusters either. It s no big deal getting under it & adjusting them once or twice a year bwhen you service it. The brakes with manual adjusters Have a better feel to them. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
| |
| |