BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | Forums66 Topics126,780 Posts1,039,291 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | The previous owner removed 3 leaves on the front springs (I'm guessing because there are only 5 leaves now) and with the heavier 307 Chevy engine, the leaves are slightly arched in the wrong direction. I found some leaf springs on what's probably a 47-54 (may never know). Anyone know what, other than the distance between shackles, do I need to look for to ensure they'll fit my 37? | | | | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,820 | Check the width of each leaf and the length. You don't want to duplicate lengths. Also, while you are at it, put teflon strips between each leaf and smooth up the ride.
"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!" My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.Operators are standing by to take your calls! Now cruising in the Passing Lane | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | I am running mine with only five leafs. I kept the two longest then removed every other one and installed the teflon strips. It rides much this way then with a full stack of leafs. The arch is almost flat with a new set, mine are new, and only slightly arched with five removed. They never will be curved like the rears or a modern spring, they were designed as a flat spring.
Joe | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Do either of you think there's any danger in the fact that my leaves are beyond flat and arched slightly downward? | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 | Mike, if they are arched downward it sounds as if they have "given up". You can try it and see how it rides but keep an eye on them for one to crack.
...as a foot note. Some folks may say to have them "re-arched" but in all my reading and listening having them re-arched does not last and is therefore a waste of money. I cannot personally attest to that either way but it makes sense. I watched a video not long ago on a "spring company" and the info was incredible. I wish I had saved the link. | | | | Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 | I had front springs re-arched on a '38 coupe I had back in 1980. Drove it for a few years with no problems, but wonder what it would be doing by now????????
1940 Chevy 1/2 ton pickup "KC" A day without sunshine is like, well, ..... dark! | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | They never were arched up, they are designed to be flat. Here's what the 1937 Chevrolet Engineering manual says about front springs. This manual compares to old '36 chevrolets to the new and improved '37s.
" The front springs on the HALF TON truck are revised to make them of the "flat spring under design load" type, thus eliminating the camber and contributing to improved steering geometry by reducing to a minimum the "walk" (fore and aft motion) of attached parts. "
"The changes are confined to the first and second leaves of the spring. The rear eye is of the Berlin type, the horizontal centerline being approximately on the centerline of the first spring leaf. The second leaf is extended to wrap the new eye partially to give it stronger support. By this means, greater safety is made available in case the main leaf breaks near the rear eye. Additional improvement in the steering geometry is secured by reducing the slope of the spring."
Joe | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Joe H, Please take a look at the attached photo and see if you thing I'm too "over arched" downward. Facebook Leaf Spring Photo Thanks, Mike | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | I am not a member of faceboook.
Joe | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | That looks a little over arched, but it could just be the picture angle. How close is the bump stop from the frame? I will get out in the garage to night and get you a picture of mine if I can figure out my new computer and camera settings.
Joe | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Joe, There's about a 1/2 inch (1 cm) between the top of the bumpstop and the bottom of the frame. The top of the axle I beam is about 9 3/4 inches above the ground and the center of the front shackle's bolt is about a half inch lower at 9 1/4 inches. Mike | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 553 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 553 | I may be wrong, but I thought that the original straight six is heavier than the small block. | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | John, Good question; I don't know. I just assumed that if the springs were over-arched it must be because of a heavier engine. Maybe the automatic transmission is heavier than the old manual one. Whatever the reason, I'm bummed that I've probably got to spend more money to add/replace leaves. Mike | | | | Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 | Boy, those look WAY bad, and would bottom out on the frame if a pothole was even in view !!!. I would look at new springs, and, as mentioned, your steering geometry is screwed up with your current setup. Let us know what you do, we all learn from this forum 
1940 Chevy 1/2 ton pickup "KC" A day without sunshine is like, well, ..... dark! | | | | Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3 New Guy | New Guy Joined: May 2009 Posts: 3 | Yes I was going to respond too. The original 37 6 cyl is a Heavy old pig that weighs as much as a Big block Chevy. | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | I finally took my truck to a shop that fabricates leaf springs, but the tech didn't have info on the arching for a 37 1/2 ton's front and rear leaves. I provided him the specs (from the GM Heritage center) but he said it was still not the info he needed; I'm sure he can figure something out on his own but I'd like to give him something definitive.
Any idea where I can find "arching" info?
Thanks, Mike | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Alvin, I did what you said and the guy at Eaton was indeed very helpful. He knew without having to look it up that the "free arch" for a 37 1/2 ton was 2” on the front and 6 ½” on the rear. I passed that on to the shop that has my truck...couldn't talk to the tech at the time but I hope it's what he needed. Thanks, Mike | | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall | Moderator: Welcome Centre, Southern Bolters, Legion Hall Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 14,522 |  Its nice to know there are still some good guys out there that will help without asking whats in our wallet first. Thats good info to know. Thanks for the reply. | | |
| |