The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Steelonsteel, klhansen, GIJOE298, dt235sd, Philipj), 103 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,142
Posts1,056,782
Members48,454
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 181
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 181
Usually, front tires would've been a notch down in size from the rear if there was a size difference. However, based on the tires that I have available and not wanting to spend more tire money, would there be any technical problem with putting 9.00x20's on the front and 8.25x20's on the rear? When I got the truck it had worn out 9.00x20's all the way around. This is on a 1958 Chevy Spartan 80 2.5 ton (single rear axle). It would be nice to hear your feedback on this. Thanks!


1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
There is nothing wrong with having a different size tire on front as the drivers. Smaller tires will cut your top speed some. If you actually haul something, 8.25 will haul a lot. Rock haulers used them here in the 60's because they were cheaper. It may look a little odd having 8.25 on the driver and 9.00 on the steer, but if you can live with that, there is nothing wrong with it.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
May or may not need to adjust the caster angle.

Grigg


•1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
•1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
•1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
I think he would have to have an awful short wheelbase to affect caster. If its a SWB, it will probably ride like a Teddy Roosevelt truck any way...a rough rider.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
a friend of mine has 9.00's on his 6400. when the wheel is turned the tire rub on the springs.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
For an AD truck larger tires rubbing the springs and not turning as sharp is a concern, but I think on a 58 it's less of an issue?

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 181
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 181
Thanks for all the feedback! The truck is a long wheelbase: 192". The 9.00's on this truck don't seem to rub.


1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80

Moderated by  69Cuda, Super55 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0