| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
3 members (Cosmo, JW51, 1 invisible),
131
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,080 Posts1,055,956 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#73749 02/23/2007 12:00 AM | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 | I have a 4.3tbi 5spd that I want to put into a 54' 1 ton Canopy Express. The motor came out of an Astro. Has anybody tried this swap before ??
Any problems with clearance ??
chnaus | | |
#73750 02/23/2007 3:45 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I've seen a 4.3 under the hood of a 1/2-ton. Under the hood there is not a lot of difference between the trucks so it should be very similar.
The 4.3 is shorter than a small block V-8 but just as wide. I would expect interference between the exhaust manifold and the steering, but I'm just guessing.
You might consider using a '55 to '62 truck V-8 type bellhousing because it will fit your crossmember. Doing so might put the HEI too close to the firewall though.
I haven't done this swap, but there are the first issues I think of, I hope it helps.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#73751 02/23/2007 7:20 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | I'd hate to see an original 1-ton Canopy Express get hacked up. Those trucks are very rare.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#73752 02/24/2007 6:22 AM | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 | I am on your side 4onthefloor. If it won't bolt in it won't be done. Its geared for stump pulling and I would like to drive it for a few years before a complete a restoration that will render it to a trailer only mode. The GVW of the Astro rear axle is slightly more than the 54'empty weight.Wheelwell clearance is ok with altered 16" wheels.The spring ctr/ctr is 7" wider on the Astro.
OldSub: is that bellhousing the one with the angled surfaces that mate to the motor mount?? | | |
#73753 02/24/2007 6:43 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | CH yes it sounds like you have identified the correct bellhousing. The car one is slightly different but the truck one is supposed to bolt in. I don't recall what the clutch linkage ends up like.
With that bellhousing and a V-8 type bolt in crossmember you could mount that 4.3 and use your original transmission if you liked.
You are still going to have an exhaust/steering box problem and that's where the 'hacked up' issue becomes problematic. Either you move the steering box out or convert to a later box placed in front of the axle. The modifications start to sound serious...
Rear gears are something like 5.14 if I remember correctly. I have a 1-ton with a 3.70 14-bolt GM axle under it. The guy who sold it to me said the tired 216 would no longer move a load after the gearing change.
If you are going to run it with that T-5 you won't dare want to carry any load in it, that transmission is not designed for serious stress.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#73754 02/24/2007 7:43 AM | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 19 | OldSub, my second power option would be a 250 from a 75'with a backdated intake. Will that drop right in ?? chnaus | | |
#73755 02/24/2007 3:19 PM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | chnaus,
There is a 4.3 that will "drop right in" - a 54-62 261 straight six.
How far are you from Albany?
Tim | | |
#73756 02/24/2007 5:04 PM | Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 348 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 348 | the 250 is a nice choice, if your interested i can sent you a email picture of a 250 in a 54 1/2 ton if i knew how to post it here i would. if your going with the manual trans use a 55 and up v8 bellhousing that will bolt to the 250 and your x member without modification [email protected] | | |
#73757 02/25/2007 4:51 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Drop right in is limited to the early Chevy sixes like the 235 and 261. Almost drop right in are the GMC sixes like the 270 and 302.
After that the least modifications are probably the later inline sixes like the 250.
An inline six means you don't have to modify the steerng. That's likely to allow the least distruptive swap and mean it will be easiest to restore or at least make look stock.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
| |
| |