| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,162 Posts1,057,066 Members48,463 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | For the pin locks, the original style holds best. There is a spring that holds each joint tight. The retainer slips over the pin, into the groove and the lip is bent down so that it can't come out. The other modern style of clip is much thinner and tends to bend under the spring pressure. The originals are difficult to buy from description. I ended up buying some of different sizes to find out which one fit.
Last edited by truckernix; 04/15/2011 11:11 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | That is the beast. The inner curved section at the back slides into a groove in the pin. At that point the bent section is sticking up above the top of the pin. When you bend it down over the side of the pin, the whole thing cannot move enough to come out of the groove.
Last edited by truckernix; 04/15/2011 11:12 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Thanks. Now that I have parts in hand the assembly seems to make sense. Mike | | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | Truckernix, My brother and I successfully replaced the shoes and cylinders this weekend. The small middle spring-loaded pins on the articulating arms were indeed "beastly" but we got it done. Thanks for your advice on getting the right parts. Mike | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I am curious. Were you able to get them from Chevs of the 40s? | | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | I got them from Jim Carter. Chevs of the 40s had them, but I was already ordering other stuff from Jim Carter so I just got ordered from them. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 170 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 170 | As a follow-up, I've pulled the rear drums off my 46 pu, and there were no "conical springs" installed pictured in the shop manual. There are no holes in the backing plate for the J hooks to fit through either. It doesn't seem to me to be any use to only hook the conical spring on the brake shoe. Do I have the wrong backing plates? Or am I not understaning the purpose of the conical spring? Thanks. PS. I haven't pulled front yet to see if there are the conical springs there 'cause I only have one set of jack stands (next purchase). | | | | | Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 97 | The rear end on my 37 is from a 69 Camaro so it's an entirely different braking system, so I can't help you there. As for purpose of conical springs, my guess is that is that they are designed to provide a little flexibility (rather than a hard pivot) to the midpoint of the shoe. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I think there were several designs of the Huck system. My 1951 1 Ton didn't have conical springs but I thing my 38 Master may have them. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 170 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 170 | Thanks so much for the info on the conical springs. I was concerned something was wrong - makes sense that I may have a later backing plate mounted. Thanks! | | |
| |
| |