The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
7 members (wilbur53, GMCJammer51, J Lucas, 3B, walter74, dt235sd, JW51), 108 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,080
Posts1,055,952
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#73137 02/13/2007 1:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
F
Junior Member
Junior Member
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Hi fellow stovebolters.
With the advise of a buddy I am replacing the valve lifters on my 250.
I went to 3 auto parts stores and each showed me lifters that are about 1/8th of an inch taller than my originals.(the body) The oil hole and groove on the side are also a little higher. Each store double checked the part number.
My buddy says this will throw everything off in the valve train.
I disagree as they are hydralic(spellcheck). As long as the plunger does not bottom out? After 0 lash some turn 3/4 turn some 1 turn. I also believe the oil galley is wide enough to feed the oil holes on the side of each unit. Maybe Napa, Auto Zone and Advance Auto each carry the wrong lifters for a 66-250? Are they the same as a small block?
Would love to hear opinions on this.
Will post another question in relation to this subject. Thanks for any advise.

#73138 02/13/2007 1:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 662
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 662
Same as a small block Chevy.
http://no25.chuckthetruck.com/page2.html

#73139 02/13/2007 1:23 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,624
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,624
Chuckthetruck is correct. My 250 took the same lifter, which for once, made them cheap. Unless you have other issues, you have plently of adjustment in the valve train. Could be someone else put shorter lifters in before.


Six volt guy living in a twelve volt world
#73140 02/13/2007 1:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
Is there any reason to replace just the lifters, without changing the cam, too? If they're worn out, it's highly unlikely there's enough cam left to work right. Be sure to do the 20-minute break-in run at 1500 RPM or so before you let the engine idle, or you'll damage both the cam and the new lifters. It basically has to establish a new wear pattern, and the cam/lifter assembly needs to be flooded with splash oil off the crankshaft while that's happening.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
#73141 02/14/2007 1:50 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
F
Junior Member
Junior Member
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Thank-you for the advise. Since I bought the new lifters I guess I will go ahead and put them in.
I pulled the lifters from 1 cylinder and the cam looks fine, not pitted or anything unusual. Am going to pull all lifters to at least clean them and will check cam.
Do lifters actually wear out?

#73142 02/14/2007 5:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
Yes, they do. The bottom of the lifter, where it contacts the cam lobe, should be slightly convex, higher in the middle than at the edges. This is very hard to see, unless you put a straightedge across the lifter. It should rock slightly, not show a totally flat bottom, or, worst-case, show a low center. The cam lobe is also ground slightly tapered, so the lifter spins as the cam lobe operates it. Once a lifter is worn flat, or cupped, there is almost always corresponding wear at the cam lobe. It can't be seen by just looking at the lobes; it takes a degree wheel and a dial indicator to measure the wear.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0