The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (SmalltownTRKGuy, Ponchogl, Otto Skorzeny), 124 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,164
Posts1,056,983
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#723614 02/23/2011 1:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 173
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 173
I'm about to get a new set of shoes for my '52 GMC COE. I was surprised to find out that TOYO still makes a 8.25-20 radial. There aren't any available in any of our local warehouses and the extra frieght plus the extra cost above a decent quality bias ply amounts to +$150 per tire.
I don't plan on driving this truck daily, but I do plan on working the old girl some. This would be all farm to market local roads. The truck "follows the ruts" in the pavement now with a set of rock hard bias plies of questionable age. The kingpins and steering linkage seem tight.
I believe a set of radials on the front might help this some, but I don't know if the extra cost is justified for maybe 1000 mies a year.
Does anyone have any experience that would help me decide if the extra cost is justified. Thanks,
Scott


1947, 1950, & 1952 Chevrolet 1/2 ton
1952 GMC 450 series Cab Over Engine
1946 Chevrolet 2 Ton
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by Scott's50
Does anyone have any experience that would help me decide if the extra cost is justified. Thanks,
Scott
i dont have any experience in the actual ride with radials. i put about 3500 miles total between all my trucks. i did the math experience. difference of cost $150. each times six times three paid for my 59-235 rebuild for the 6100. im told that if i had radials id notice a big difference in handling and ride headscratch. ive drove the ashton to stovebolt headquarters two years ago and it was a six hour ride each way. with the nice seat i have made it a pleasant ride so it wouldnt have matter what tire i have.

its your choice but what could you do with the extra money not spent on radials grin

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,962
Bias tires handled the job 50 years ago, and they will still do the job. Although I have had nothing but radials on my over the road fleet for over 30 years, I still prefer bias for something used occasionally. Radials have a tendency to blow out after 5 to 7 years because they rot where the belts are attached to the bead. A bias tire is constructed differently, and although the sidewalls may look cracked, they are still sound. I know lots of farmers who have 30 year old bias tires on their field trucks. They use them during the harvest and they spend most of their life in a shed. I have quite a few old storage trailers. Most of the tires have blown out by just sitting there.


Moderated by  69Cuda, Super55 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0