| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,195 Posts1,057,369 Members48,469 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2011 Posts: 23 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2011 Posts: 23 | both have the same engine 235 but the c10 has a 3 speed in the floor manual.
reason im asking i got a completely rebuilt SM420 to go in the C40 there is nothing wrong with current one in it.
i wanting to put the 4 speed in the c10 because the transmission in it is so weak and it grinds in every gear.
what mods do i have to do with the c10 to put the 4 speed in it??
thanks Jake. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 942 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 942 | The biggest problem is the Floor Hump. The Factory 3-Speed truck will have a Low Hump on it and the truck 4-Speed requires the High Hump. That reason alone has made me decide not switch some of them through the years. If you have a good garage, a welder and a good High Hump Floor section available, it would make it an easier project.
I believe you would also have to change the Bell Housing as the 4-Speed trans should require a larger Input Shaft Housing Opening. You also may have to change the length of the Drive Shaft.
Bill
'60-'72 Chev/GMC Fan GMC 9500 Fan Detroit Diesel Fan
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 | the frt brg retainer did not get larger until the advent of the sm465 ,1968 I believe ron | | | | | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | I agree w/ Ron, the 3 speed front retainer changed in 68 too, which would have been co-incident with the 4 speed and bellhouse change .... I'd say the only problem Jake faces is the floor pan
Bill | | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 | but only in the trucks. passenger car remained the same ron | | | | | Joined: Jan 2011 Posts: 23 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jan 2011 Posts: 23 | so all i have to change is the floor hump? if so that is better than i thought it would be. my cousin has a parts 63 C20 with the large hump floor and im good with a welder so this shouldn't be any problem.
also i think the 4 spd should work well with the c10 since i believe it has a 4:10 rear might give it extra oomph hauling wood.
thanks gents! Jake
Last edited by jakewells; 02/01/2011 7:10 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | I think a big problem will be the drive shaft. The 4 speed probably has an emerg. brake on the back. If you have the shaft from the donor truck you could have the front part adapted the the 3 speed shaft. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | |
| |
| |