| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (walter74),
89
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,050 Posts1,055,644 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 22 | Installing a 1996 Lt1 chevy v/8 in a 1950 chevy 3100.What bell housing/ flywheel ? Will it bolt up to the original tranny? ,Thanks Bob Fortner | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Well you have to use a flywheel appropriate to the motor. I've read that there are some differences in later motors based on the change in main seal design, but I don't know the ins and outs of that and don't want to be the one answering that part of the question.
The motor will bolt to any of the early Chevy V-8 bellhousings, so choosing a bellhousing might be more about choosing your approach to mounting the motor and setting up the clutch.
If I were doing this I'd look at changing the bellhousing crossmember to a '54/'55 1st type because that easily mounts the V-8 type bellhousing from a '55 to '59. Most guys probably just make an adapter rather than change the crossmember.
While I've not done it, I believe using a '55 to '59 truck bellhousing will both simplify the mounting and make building clutch linkage a straight forward task.
Later bellhousings up through I think '67 are similar but different ones have variations that complicate the picture. Any of them are going to bolt to your transmission.
You don't say which transmission you have. If its the SM420 4-speed that same transmission was used up through 1967 and is tough enough you are probably fine using it.
If you have a 3-speed I personally would be worried about durability.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 | Any V8 bellhousing 55-66 will bolt in for you. Use the flywheel correct for the engine. Clutch will likely have to be looked up by dimensions. You will probably have 1 1/8 inch 10 spline input, and either 11" or 10.4" surface. GM used both for many years, just know what you need when shopping. That should hook you up to your original tranny as well as later model open drives. That same bellhousing and clutch setup will also cover passenger car transmissions like Muncies and T10s if you're so inclined.
Devin
If you can't hose it out it ain't a truck
55 3100 63 Corvair Monza 64 El Camino 72 240Z 01 Suburban
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 | I forgot to consider that to mount a V8 in an AD you're going to have to offset the engine an inch or two to the passenger side for exhaust manifold clearance. I don't know if the bellhousing mounts will allow that. The other option is to move the steering box towards the left, which will offset the steering in a manner I don't care for.
Devin
If you can't hose it out it ain't a truck
55 3100 63 Corvair Monza 64 El Camino 72 240Z 01 Suburban
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 149 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 149 | 55 Tractor, does the motor look completely out of place when you offset it to the left? Or is the adjustment small enough that nobody notices? Also, if you do that, wouldn't the tail of the tranny aim the wrong direction to screw up the pinion angle? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | My choice would be to either move the steering box to the outside of the rail or go with IFS but not to off center the engine.
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,767 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,767 | I believe the offset procedure involves moving the whole assembly, engine and trans, to one side by modifying the rear crossmember mounting points as well as fabricating new front mounts. A side-to-side movement of the engine/trans centerline doesn't have any adverse effect on the driveline alignment, it just makes the driveshaft run at a slight sideways angle. Lots of vehicles do that. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 | If off setting the engine and trans causes problems then there wouldn't be any Ford vans on the road. Theirs is further to the right than Rush Limbaugh. We used to make cheap narrowed 9 inchers by using two right axles and tubes from 70's vans.
Evan
| | |
| |
| |