The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Labor Day

Labor Day

Putting down your wrenches or time for
MORE wrenching?

Wrenching this Labor Day
Plenty of places to share.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Wickedbass, tclederman, Youngin' Tut 59, UtahYork, Woogeroo), 37 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,010
Posts1,055,303
Members48,419
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#655253 06/16/2010 8:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 128
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 128
I have a 1951 235 with worn piston walls. I was wondering if, instead of boring the cylinders over, I could sleeve the piston wall 1/8 inch smaller and get a set of 3 and 7/16 inch pistons. The current bore is original at 3 and 9/16 inches. I know there might be some power loss, but is this the only downside? Has it been done? Is it plausible? Don't laugh...


1946 2 Ton Flatbed
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
LOL Sorry I couldn't help it. Any thing is possible but practical, no. It would cost more then boreing the cylinders. I would look for a 54 up engine . They have the insert rods with pressure lube system. Then rebuild from there.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,742
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,742
Yes, and I've done that on occasion to meet low displacement limits on certain race tracks. For instance, one dirt track where we raced had a 375 cubic inch limit. One car owner wanted lots of torque, so he sleeved down a Chevy 396 big block to legal size. The car was too front-heavy, and handled lousy, so the off-the-corner torque didn't help much.

If you try that, you'll need to bore the taper-worn cylinders straight first, then drive sleeves in, then bore the sleeves to accept whatever pistons you decide to use. By the time all that is done, you could have bought another block, and had money left over. You could sleeve the engine back to standard bore, and reuse the original pistons, at approximately twice the cost of doing an oversize rebore and buying new pistons. Sleeves cost somewhat more than pistons, plus the machining labor to install them. Doable, yes- - - -practical, NO!
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 128
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 128
Thanks, fellas. Good to know. Glad I supplied the laughs for this afternoon.


1946 2 Ton Flatbed

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0