Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,068 Posts1,055,882 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | Hi Guys,
I bought new rocker arm shafts for my '54 261, and wouldn't you know it, I got the arms out of order when cleaning them! :mad:
The casting number stamps are too faint to read, but there are large numbers cast into the arm. I have three each of #3,4,7 and 8. I've tried various combinations and what seems to line up best with the valves is the following order, front to back. (E=exhaust, I=intake)
3E,8I,4I,7E,3E,8I,4I,7E,3E,8I,4I,7E
But....according to the service manual (for the 235), #3 and 4 are supposed to both be intakes, and there is no mention of #7 or 8.
I thought that the 261 and 235 rocker arms were interchangable? What am I not getting here? :confused: | | |
#6249 06/24/2004 12:06 PM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | 53Therapy,
This reply won't be of much help - more questions than answers.
1. What manual are you using? The 1954 Truck Shop Manual?
2. The 1954 (and maybe other years) rocker arms and shafts for the 261 were supposedly "beefier" than those on the 235 (this is stated in the 1954 Technical Specification Manual). The arms have different numbers on the 261 (1, 2, 5, 6) than on the 235 (9, 0, 3, 4).
3. The 1957 and 1960 Truck Shop Manuals show completely different numbers on the rocker arms. Most likely, the automobile 235 rocker arsm also have different numbers.
4. Nonetheless, most likely, all 1954-1962 235/261 rocker arm assemblies are interchangeable (in other words, they will fit on all the 1954-1962 235 and 261 engines). I would guess that they will all work OK for use on smaller trucks.
Regardless of the numbers on your arms, your Manual should show the orientation (and shape) of the rocker arms ("Fig. 15 - Layout of Rocker Arm and Shaft Parts" in my 1954 Manual). Also, the Manual shows the differences in body profiles for the Inlet and Exhaust arms (Fig. 14). Let me know if you want pictures posted (I could post them tomorrow).
Good luck, Tim | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | If I remember correctly, the Shop manual is pretty specific. I think that you should have a left and right exhaust and a left and right intake, as types. | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,904 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,904 | I have 3 rocker arm assemblies with 3 different numberings
Older 235: 9 0 3 4 Newer 235: 87 88 85 86 1961 261: 7 8 5 6
(The four code numbers are for 1-3-5 exhaust, 2-4-6 exhaust, 2-4-6 intake, 1-3-5 intake, respectively.)
Could it be that they mixed the 7 and 8 from a 261 with a 3 and 4 from an older 235? Is there a difference in their heftiness? 1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet 34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | On every 235/261 I worked on, the rocker arm numbers shown in the factory manual weren't marked the stuff I was looking at. They really only go on one way, so assemble them on the shaft without the stands and spacers so they match up properly to the valves. Then number them, and reassemble with all the parts.If it looks good,it is good. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | I'm using the shop manual for the older trucks, up to '51. I should have invested in a '54 manual as well.
It sounds like this engine has mixed up 235 and 261 valves, but they both look equally "hefty".
Pictures would be a BIG help! Thanks!
Also, my intakes #3 & 8 have a "ridge" cast on each side of the arms, the exhaust do not, they are "plain".
Thanks | | |
| |