Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,109 Posts1,056,269 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | After reading the "Tons 'o fun" forum threads I'm thinking about buying a 1 ton '50's Chevy.
Besides fixing this truck up, I want to put it to work. It would fill a need to haul cord wood, gravel, saw dust, etc.
I would like this truck to be a 4 speed manual. Other wise, any recommendations from you big bolters??
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Given what you want to haul I'd suggest the flat bed and maybe duals rather than a box.
There aren't a lot of options that are likely to make a big difference for your application. If fixing the truck up includes making modifications I'd make more suggestions, but just stock, limited to a Chevy, there just aren't that many options that will make a whole lot of difference.
I will say that you might look for one that already has a 261 or a GMC 270 or 302. You're likely to want more power then a 216 or 235 are going to offer. Those bigger motors won't be in a Chevy unless someone modified it.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Well, I was thinking of a 235. However, if it's too under powered I'm not above replacing it with a larger six. I would like to stick with a six though. I just like these engine's. I would even think about a 292 even though they suck so much fuel.
Thanks for the suggestions. I could make a flat bed look really cool. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | If you don't mind taking your time a pretty much stock truck will get the job done. A 235 or better yet a 261 would be good.
If that plan suits, then a pickup will have plenty of bed space for firewood or gravel. You can fit a whole lot of firewood in a 9' bed, even without side boards, I know I have on occasion. Probably can fit more gravel than you'd want to haul. A pickup bed full of mulch is quite a load, again no side boards but just piled high.
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Thanks Grigg for the info.
Before I purchase a 1 ton, I'm going to slightly modify my '60 Chevy to ready it for a 1600 mile round trip to Yellowstone.
I plan to add headers with dual exhaust going from 1 3/4" to 2 1/4" exhaust pipes to add a little more HP and torque. Also, I'm going to change the intake manifold or add an adapter so I can bolt on a 2 barrel carb.
Then, I will start looking for a 1 ton truck. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,186 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,186 | I really like the flatbeds because they look like mini big bolts. If your keeping it more or less original like me, you really don't need to make tons of modifications. The only real change I'm doing is installing a 1954 261. Possibly it's only me but I think part of the fun of an old truck is the fact it doesn't go fast! I have other vehicles that do that.
Bruce | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,107 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,107 | with what you have in mind look for something that has a dump bed on it. youll find it more versatile and wont need to shovel it off the back. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Thanks for the advice. I like your flatbed Bruce!
A hydrolic dump bed would be nice. Better than throwing the wood off the back of the truck only to restack it again.
Okay, so far..... A flat bed, duel wheels, dump bed, larger six, four speed tranny. This is good stuff!
Oh, what about a two speed rear end. Are these common in 1 tons? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | 2-speed rears are not common in 1-tons.
GM didn't offer one that I am aware of, and if there is an aftermarket one I don't know about it.
I can't say they don't exist at all because proving a negative like that is nearly impossible, but I would not waste any time looking for one if you really want to buy a truck.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 48 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 48 | Given what you want to haul I'd suggest the flat bed and maybe duals rather than a box.
There aren't a lot of options that are likely to make a big difference for your application. If fixing the truck up includes making modifications I'd make more suggestions, but just stock, limited to a Chevy, there just aren't that many options that will make a whole lot of difference.
I will say that you might look for one that already has a 261 or a GMC 270 or 302. You're likely to want more power then a 216 or 235 are going to offer. Those bigger motors won't be in a Chevy unless someone modified it. That's what I got...! And if we ever do get it running, we're gonna swap in a 261.
'76 F-350 Super Camper Special (140" WB), Ranger-XLT, Fast 390 V8, 4-Speed, Gun Rack, Brush Guard, Dual Exhaust, 3.73 Gears, 10K GVW. '74 F-250 Super-Cab (155" WB), Ranger, Rebuilt 390 V8, C6 Auto, Tachometer, Headers, '77 Grille, Kill Switch, Single Exhaust, 4.11 Gears. '59 Chevy 38 Apache Stakebed (Not running), 235-Inline-6, 4-speed, Gun Rack, 3 Tanks, Dual Rear Wheel, 9.5K GVW & no fancy stuff. '99 Mitsubishi Fuso 5-Ton Delivery Truck, Diesel, 4-Speed Auto, 1-Ton Lift Gate, 18FT Box.
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 Former Workshop Owner | | Former Workshop Owner Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,409 | I know that this is the one ton forum, but if you're looking for a work truck, you may want to include the short wheel base 1.5 tons in your search. It seems that they are somewhat scarce, but just another option to widen your search. If you check out one tons only, you may not find many to look at. Either way, I would look for one with the least amount of major work.
Besides, the shorty "Big Bolts" are cool.
John
~ J Lucas 2006 GMC Envoy 4.2 I6 2023 Ram 2500/Cumins 6.7 I6 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Wife’s) 2002 Silverado 2500 Gas 6.0 1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton 1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWBIn the Gallery My Flicker Photos! | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Thanks John. I never considered a 1.5 ton. I will keep my eye out for one as well. I didn't know they produced a 1.5 shorty! I like the looks of your '42 1.5 ton SWB.
My problem is I don't know a lot about the larger trucks, but I'm learning!! | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | A 1-1/2 ton might have a 2-speed rear, though I doubt that is common in a 4100 which has a 137 inch wheel base and the same frame basically as a 1-ton.
Good luck finding the right truck! You've sure got a bunch of opinions on just what it will be...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Well, a 1 to 1.5 ton flat bed or with a standard 9' box bed either one with dual wheels seems common enough to be found isn't it?? Other things can be modified after the fact, such as the engine.
It doesn't need to have a 2 speed rear. I just didn't know if they even made such a truck in a 1 ton.
Last edited by Iron Clad; 03/01/2010 1:46 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | You won't find a 1-ton with a box AND duals that is original. The flatbeds seem easier to find either single wheel or dual. In the 50's GM didn't put a box on anything bigger than a 1-ton.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | I like the thought of a flatbed anyway. However if a decent 1 ton with a box comes up I would have to consider it.
Thanks for the info OldSub. This thread has been an education. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The 1-ton box isn't real common and finding a good one would be a great thing. Grab it if you find it!
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 446 | Will do!! Now that I think about it, I don't remember seeing one for sale anywhere around here. I have seen 1 ton flatbeds a few times though.
I like a challenge.... When I complete the few modifications on my '60 the search will be on!! | | |
| |