| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,087 Posts1,055,985 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 | I have a 51 3100 with a 350/350 combo. I currently have a 77 Nova 10 Bolt 7.5 ring gear differential in it. I just got a 1980 Trans AM 10 Bolt Posi 3.08 Gear for free. I am going to switch out the rear ends and while I am at it I have decided to ditch the stock 60 year old leaf springs and put in some S10 rear Leaf springs. The S10 springs are about the same length but are 2 1/2" wide. I will fab up some mounting brackets and should be able to use the Trans AM spring pads. My question is: there are 3 or more different S10 springs available. 3 Leaf, 4 Leaf, and 5 Leaf. Which ones should I go with? I am more concerned with ride quality than load handling. I don't think I will ever be hauling much.
Any thoughts?
Kelly 1951 Chevy 3100 1967 RS/SS Camaro
| | | | | Joined: May 2007 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2007 Posts: 275 | I would go with the 4 leaf. It will give you a smoother ride and not be as stiff as the 5. Just won't have the load capacity as the 5. Frank Cox Cox Custom Cars
No better smell than that of fresh paint. I've been building and painting cars/trucks for 47 years. Not gonna stop now. http://www.coxcustomcars.com/ | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | I would go with the 4 leaf as well, good comprimise. 3 leaf is base 2wd, 4 leaf is HD 2wd/base 4x4, 5 leaf is HD 4x4. There is also a 3 leaf that is stiffer than the base 3 leaf, those are used on the ZQ8 sport suspension trucks.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 | I picked up a nice set of 4 leaf S10 springs yesterday for $20.00. Now I need to go get some steel to start fabing my mounts.
FYI, the guy I got the Springs from is building a 1950 3100 and putting it on an S10 frame. The frame is all preped with the brackets, motor/trans. It looks great. It was just a coincidence that I got these springs from another "Old Truck Guy". I put a wanted ad in our local online classifieds and he gave me a call. It was pretty cool.
Last edited by redshiba; 02/25/2010 3:06 PM.
Kelly 1951 Chevy 3100 1967 RS/SS Camaro
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 57 | I got all of the old rear end, springs, mounts etc. removed yesterday and am in the process or measuring and mocking up the new rear end, springs mounts etc. I have read that most people move the rear end back about 1.5" for a good visual centering in the fender, That is where I had my previous rear end located. What is the most that I can move the rear and back and sill have it look good? I will have tho move the new rear end back about 2.5" from the stock location in order to use my current drive line. If I put my new rear end in at 1.5" back I will have to get the drive line shortened. Will 2.5" still allow for a good visual tire fender centering appearance?
Any thoughts about 1.5" VS 2.5"
Kelly 1951 Chevy 3100 1967 RS/SS Camaro
| | | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 1,312 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2004 Posts: 1,312 | Depending on trans setup you are running, there is some slack on the driveshaft spline. I would set the box on the frame to get your correct measurements / adjust driveshaft to suit. | | |
| |
| |