Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,188 Posts1,057,334 Members48,469 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 |  I have a 51 GMC 3/4 ton, I am considering two options; change out the front axle to a 1/2 front and install disc brakes, or install a Mustang 2 suspension. My question what is involved to install the M2 suspension. Do I have to pull the engine out, or just slip out the old straight axle and bolt in the M2 suspension. Can anyone enlighten me on this issue on what is all involve here besides the expensive cost of the M3 suspension? Also is there a shop in the So Cal are that does this type of work reasonably? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The Mustang II kits are all designed for 1/2-ton trucks, so will require modification to work on your 3/4-ton. Most the kits I've seen require boxing the frame in the area where the suspension attaches, and that would be much easier to do with the motor out of the way.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 | thanks for the info, I didn't know those kits were for 1/2 tons only. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 20 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 20 | I thought The front on chevy 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton -51- are the same. Not GMC ? Pat
pf
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 | The Mustang II kits are all designed for 1/2-ton trucks, so will require modification to work on your 3/4-ton. I believe that both are the same up front. The rear spring setup is the the main difference. 3/4 ton springs sit on the outside of the frame rails while the 1/2 tons mounted under the frame. I've seen several guys with 3/4 tons use the MII. Check with Big Chevy 3600. He's running the Mustang II on his 3600. I used the ifs from a '79 1/2 ton myself but there are other choices available. Scott Danforth listed them earlier in this forum.
Robert C. If it's true what they say, "You learn from your mistakes," I'm a Genius in the making. 1950 3600 | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 | My goal is to get this GMC up and running after 16 years setting in my garage for the next Good Guys Car Show at Del Mar Race Track in Del Mar Calif., Then cruse up the coast on PCH 101.
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | My kit will fit a 3/4T. And it is NOT a Mustang variant.
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,026 | Well Junky, wat did you decide on?
Robert C. If it's true what they say, "You learn from your mistakes," I'm a Genius in the making. 1950 3600 | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | 1/2 tons are the same as 3/4 tons up front once you remove the suspension. I thought the frame material was thicker, which I'd expect to cause problems with boxing plates. Am I mistaken?
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | | ZooKeeper Unregistered | | ZooKeeper Unregistered | 1/2 tons are the same as 3/4 tons up front once you remove the suspension. I thought the frame material was thicker, which I'd expect to cause problems with boxing plates. Am I mistaken? According to THIS page there seems to be a difference. The width might be the same(doesn't show info), BUT the thickness of the frame is different...Joe | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | The height is different by .093" and the frame thickness is 10 gauge on the 1/2 ton and 7 gauge on the 3/4 ton.
My cross member kit still fits fine, however there is now a small gap that needs an extra 1/2 hour of welding. I also have 7 gauge boxing plates for those that want same thickness on the boxing plates.
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | So Scott any idea what the Mustang II vendors are doing to deal with the descrepancy?
I'm not surprised you have a solution, but don't like hearing everyone say the Mustang option fits both when there seems to be some modification required.
Of course I've not done anyone's kit...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | The whole adventure is a task in modification 1/2 ton or 3/4 ton. It's certainly not a Tinker Toy undertaking. And no the vendors don't seem to want to build much of anything for the 3/4 tons. It has been my experience that most things designed for the 1/2 ton will fit the 3/4 ton with minor tweaking. That's what makes it fun.
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 | I bought a complete 1/2 front axle, it was in good condition and only $150.00 such a deal. I ordered new hardware for it, I want to replace the old fatigued bolts, just want to be keep things together being safe going down the road. I want to get this truck running down the road, but I don't have a lot of cash now, so for now the straight axle I bought will work just fine, I need to swap out the old 3/4 ton rear axle, any ideas what I can swap it out for? I want to go with a 5 lug patten, and get rims and tires for my Junky 51 GMC. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I used the rear axle from a '73 Chevelle under mine. Do a little searching here, lots of possible choices have been used.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 | Would a rear end from an old S10 work? | | | | | Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,750 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,750 | I need to swap out the old 3/4 ton rear axle, any ideas what I can swap it out for? I want to go with a 5 lug patten, and get rims and tires for my Junky 51 GMC. Jimmy... this article might help. 1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in ScotlandIn the Stovebolt GalleryMore pix on Flickr. I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | I used an 80' Camaro w/posi and then bought a set of disc brakes off a 2002 Trans Am which will bolt on.
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | So Scott any idea what the Mustang II vendors are doing to deal with the descrepancy?
I'm not surprised you have a solution, but don't like hearing everyone say the Mustang option fits both when there seems to be some modification required.
Of course I've not done anyone's kit... I would suspect that they either have a bit of slop in their design, or their instructions read torch to shape, grind to fit, paint to match. Since the bottom and outside of the frame are nearly the same, they most likely will be locating it on the bottom and outside
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | Best bet, if you are have questions call the vendor.
~Jim
| | |
| |