| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,083 Posts1,055,967 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 96 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 96 | Hello All,
Getting ready to reassemble a freshly machined 261. I was reading the Factory manual and it said to use .002 shims on the main bearings to start with in order to make sure the crankshaft is properly aligned. The new bearings that I have don't have anything that look like a shim, what are they made out of and is it something that I will find at my local parts store? Is it even worth avoiding placing these shims or is it a must? Thanks, any advice on this and points beyond are always appreciated.
Whad you do?!?
Shane 1953 Chevrolet 3600
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 110 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 110 | Shane, I'm not familiar with a 261 as per say, but I'll see if I can shed some light on the situation. The older model engines had poured babbet rods and mains. Somewhere around '53 or '54 they GM changed to replaceable inserts. If you have inserts, they (along with the crankshaft) should be machined within tolerance and shims won't be needed. You could get some plasti-gauge and check the clearance (should be about .0015 to .003--check your manual) It's been 30 years since I have rebuilt that type of engine. Maybe someone else can shed more candlepower to this. Truck Tinker | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | If your manual is for a 1953, I don't think that it is giving you the correct instructions for a 261, maybe a 216 or older style 235. I don't think that the 261 would use shims in the main bearings. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 96 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 96 | Truckernix & Tinker(er),
Thanks for the reply...that would answer my suspicions. You guys are very perceptive, I am as a matter of fact using the '53 manual. I didn't even stop to consider which engine they were basing this advice on. Thanks, I will go ahead with the installation of the bearings. One other thing it mentioned was gapping the cam thrust plate with the proper amount of gaskets to assure a 'given' clearance. I can't remember the clearance, want to say .003-.005 Anyhow, I suppose I will need to pull the cam back out to do this since my machine shop put it in. Should the cam journals be PERFECTLY in line with the bearings or is it possible that they might overlap the edge one way or the other?
Whad you do?!?
Shane 1953 Chevrolet 3600
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 110 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 110 | Can't say for sure right off the bat, but I would think that a small degree off wouldn't hurt, but check any specs you can because now is the best time to make sure everything is right. Truck Tinker | | |
#5708 05/24/2004 11:27 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I can't help you on the cam thrust clearance issue but the relationship between the cam journals and the bearings, in the position along the length would not be particularly precise. The spec may be associated with hom much clearance there is between the timing gear and the front plate. | | |
| |
| |