The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Charles in CA, JW51, Brewhog55, 1 invisible), 562 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,781
Posts1,039,301
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#562769 08/07/2009 3:11 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
5
Apprentice
Apprentice
5 Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
I think I already know the answer, but here goes....
I was told when buying this truck that it was on a '76 chevy frame. After looking at it closely, I believe it is the original frame with a '76 chevy rear end, and cross member/suspension. If you look at the following pics, could you tell me what you think. It seems to me that the cab mounts and spring mounts are not '76 style, and the factory rivets that hold the cab mounts on are intact.
I didn't think it was possible to mount a suspension from another truck without cutting the frame, and these frame rails appear uncut.
Lastly,
I really don't like the way it is lowered (I believe it's on drop spindles), and I'd like the wheels under the fender wells in front. Basically, I want it to look like it came from the factory with the tall skinny tires, sitting up higher----but with a MUCH better ride than the original suspension. Is there a way to do this? Will a mustang II suspension with regular spindles keep the ride height original yet give a good ride? Could I graft on an S10 frame in front?
ALso, since it appears the original rear springs are in the truck. WHy does the modern rear end sit farther back in the fender well?
Sorry for all the questions---eager to learn. Here's the pics:

http://inlinethumb19.webshots.com/43730/2355125590104021666S600x600Q85.jpg
http://inlinethumb54.webshots.com/43125/2903632920104021666S600x600Q85.jpg
http://inlinethumb49.webshots.com/21680/2069016390104021666S600x600Q85.jpg
Thanks,
Jason

Last edited by 58evinrude; 08/07/2009 3:46 AM. Reason: forgot links
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 173
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 173
Perhaps it's me, but I don't see the link to the pics...


1947, 1950, & 1952 Chevrolet 1/2 ton
1952 GMC 450 series Cab Over Engine
1946 Chevrolet 2 Ton
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Ummm, pix??
It is possible to mount the suspension, there's several here that have done it. Noce thing about the '70s Chevy trucks suspension is that the entire crossmember can be removed from the frame intact, without cutting the frame itself. As far as getting the ride hight up, if the current suspension is working alright, you could go with a set of stock spindles and possibley a set of stock replacement springs to get the ride back up. Going Mustang 2 will most likly make it even lower, rather than raise it. Same goes for the S-10 swap.
On the rearend, it probably wasn't centered correctly on the spring perches, especially if it was converted from spring under to spring over. It should be noted, the factory rearend was not centered in the opening on the AD trucks originally. They were roughly 2 1/2" forward of center.


Bill Burmeister
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
5
Apprentice
Apprentice
5 Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Sorry guys,
I had to edit my post. I'm not really very good at the url thing. I think it's fixed now.
Thanks for your time,
Jason

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,201
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,201
The 53 frame is basically straight from front to rear with a slight hump over the rear axle and tapers inward to the front . The front axle had no hump over it. The 76 frame will have a hump over both axles. here is a picture, the frame in the background is a 53 3/4 ton and the frame in the foreground is a 73 3/4 ton.


1953 Chevrolet 3600
Fried Green T'mater (Vern)
In the Stovebolt Gallery
Caution: Political Statement
Man who runs in front of car gets tired, man who runs behind car gets exhausted.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
5
Apprentice
Apprentice
5 Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Thanks monster,
I couldn't see the link but your description was very clear, and I'm even more certain my frame is still '53 vintage.

I'm guessing by the responses above that the only way to make it look stock as far as ride height is to be stock? No way to get a stock ride height and drive decent?
Thanks for your responses,
Jason

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 769
58er

The pictures are of a 53 frame that has had the newer front suspension added.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
5
Apprentice
Apprentice
5 Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Thanks Lonnie,
Jason


Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.050s Queries: 14 (0.047s) Memory: 0.6281 MB (Peak: 0.7013 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 22:36:07 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS