The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
1 members (mason86), 63 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,050
Posts1,055,671
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#48666 08/04/2005 6:22 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
I need to get some advice from someone who has actually done one so I don't have too many unforseen problems.

I have a 49 chevy 3/4 ton that I'd like to change the rear end out of. I don't want to hot rod, in fact I would like to keep the truck as original as possible.

With that said, for the life of me, I don't know why the speedometer reads as high as 80 mph, I couldn't hit 80 mph if I fell off a cliff. Any way, it's also too hard and too expensive to replace the brakes and drums, that's if I can find the parts.

So the question is what rear end can I put in my truck that will exchange easily and allow me to brake better and to find readily available parts for when needed, and would allow my truck to break the cob webs off the speedo needle, maybe cruise at 65 or 70 mph.

I would like to go with a six lug 1/2 ton setup if possible because there are so many more parts for 1/2 tons vs. 3/4 tons.

Lastly for the purists, after 56 years of this truck being kept original, should I just keep the truck the way it is. I guess what I mean is, did any of you do a rear end change out on a completely original truck only to regret it afterwards? I'd like to hear some input.

Thanks in advance,
Sam

#48667 08/04/2005 9:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 345
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 345
There's tons of input on rear end swaps. Do a search witnin this forum. Independent 3rd member is a very easy swap on the 3/4 tons if you have an open rear drive shaft, and this keeps your truck virtually original. This can give you a higher top end but will not help braking-in fact you will not brake as well on compression with a taller differential.

#48668 08/05/2005 10:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
there are 4.11 and some rare 3.73 third mebers that you can get for those axles
the brakes are not realy that much harder to get
epxt that you might have to order wheel cylinders from some old parts company (Brothers,
ChevysOfThe40s, Jim Carter,)


Luke Dahlin

1946 Chevy 2 ton
1966 Chevy 2 ton
1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4wd
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery/dahlin_luke_1969.html]1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4
#48669 08/09/2005 8:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Sam - One option you have is to find a 47-54 1/2 ton torque tube (truck)and buy the Patricks 3.55 ring and pinion.

#48670 08/10/2005 3:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
10 or the slightly heavier 12 bolt , Oh mid 70's chevy burbs, blazers and 4x4, all had 6 lug and parts are easy to obtain. they came in 3.08, 3.43 and 3.73:1.0 ratios. spring purches may need to be moved as well as shock attachments on the axle. It's funny now, the manufacturers are placing the shock mounts on the outside of the springs like our trucks AD's but for years they had them way inboard. GO FIGURE.
cheers


Jim & Caroline
The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense."
Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
#48671 08/10/2005 3:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 194
A
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
A Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 194
I went with an early 80's Blazer rear axle with a 3:08 ratio and positraction. Very easy swap ad retained the 1/2 ton six lug wheels. You will have to cut off the blazer spring mounts and weld on new ones. If the u-bolts are not long enough to use the AD shock mounts, you may have to fab new shock mounts.

Very easy swap, took me 8 hours other than the e-brake cables which probably took another 8 hours. This is discussed in another post.

Remember if you go this way and have a stock torque tube you will also have to change the tranmission to an open driveline type.

The 3:08 ratio is great for cruising, I can now run 65 MPH at 2200 RPM. But you do lose some acceleration and power. If I had to do it again, I would look for something in the 3:40 ratio range.

So that means it never ends! I am now in the process of finishing a GMC 302 to put in the truck.

#48672 08/10/2005 4:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
Thanks for all of your good advice, I'll keep you folks posted on how it all turns out.

#48673 08/10/2005 5:37 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 171
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 171
this rear end was used all the way into the '70s and jim carters has a 4.10 ring & pinion conversion for it.
robert


Robert French MY3800FIRETRUCK
#48674 08/10/2005 9:24 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
Why spend mega-bucks on a new 4.10 ring and pinion, when you can get a good carrier with one from a '67-'72 3/4-ton truck for $60 at the pick-n-pull??? You have to use a '63-'72 carrier for the new ring and pinions, anyway.


Get a REAL truck, get a GMC! www.oldgmctrucks.com
1954 GMC De Luxe COE
#48675 08/10/2005 4:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 255
O
Member
Member
O Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 255
GMC Panel has it exactly right. If you swap to any other axle, you will have 6 lugs in the back and 8 in the front. You will have to carry two spares or a cell phone. Switching to a 1/2 ton front axle will cure that and will also get rid of those 8-hole safety rims, but then you still have the expense of the Patricks gears. Find you a good 4.10 rear carrier.
Ralph


rtlopez@shipleysystems.com
48 Chevy 3600 w/235
48 Chevy 3100 w/235:
You cant see the smoke on a dirt road.
#48676 08/12/2005 7:42 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 37
O.K., lets open another can of worms. I'm looking for a easy switch out of the rear end to get rid of the lack of supply for 49 3/4 ton brakes and to put on something that parts are plentiful for, and as long as I'm doing this I might as well switch to six lug rims. I want to use the original hub caps which for the 3/4 ton are twice the size of the 1/2 ton hub cap because it has to fit over the protuding rear axel. I don't care for the giant hub cap.

Now after I do this, what about the front rims?
Is there any way to just replace the hub with one that will change out to a six lug pattern or do I have to change out the front axel completely. Anybody know?


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0