Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,130 Posts1,056,720 Members48,454 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 | Going from 3 spd/OD to 700R4 in my '56 1/2 tn--wife has bad wheels and has trouble running the clutch. After reading previous posts, I'm thinking a 3.73 ring & pinion would be best. What's the word on the 'Bolt? | | | | | Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 | 3.73 is a good place to start. What engine are you running?
If you are running a high HP motor, you could go with higher gears, but a 3.73 w/ OD is about the limit for a 235. Others may disagree. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | if you haul stuff often, the 3.73's are a good choice, however if you are empty often, a set of 3.42's is nice. 3.08's would be a little bit for the 261
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | What rear is under it now? If you still have the original 3.90, I'd leave it in there.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 239 | What drive ratio is the stock overdrive? I don't remember. I think it's comparable to the 700R4. It's a place to start anyway. The 700 has a nice low first, almost as low as the first in the old 3 speed. Are freeway rpms reasonable now?
Devin
If you can't hose it out it ain't a truck
55 3100 63 Corvair Monza 64 El Camino 72 240Z 01 Suburban
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Don't forget to factor in tire size, the actual outside diameter, a few inches makes a significant difference in effective gear ratio. All of the above suggestions and comments mean nothing without knowing what tire size they have in mind. For example, a truck with 26" tires and a 3.73 ratio is equivalent to having 4.16 (an imaginary ratio) and 29" tires. You can see in this example a 3" taller tire requires about one step up in gear ratio, 4.11 would be the closest available ratio. This will help you figure speeds and rpm with tire size and gear ratios. http://www.onlineconversion.com/bigger_tires.htmIf you like how it drives now, then compare the final drive ratios and gear it so you get the same thing, the same engine rpm for a given road speed. Or if you feel the engine needs to run faster or slower at a given road speed then correct for that by changing gears and or tire size. Grigg
Last edited by Grigg; 12/13/2008 4:10 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 | Original rear long gone. Currently 3.31 gears in 12 bolt posi with 225 70 R 15 tires on 5-bolt Corvette Ralleys. The 261 was bored .30 over, head shaved .20, Clifford 6=8 intake, Holley 390, Fentons. Tires 27 1/2" tall and 86 1/4" circumference. Has always seemed gears were a little tall especially on hilly terrain north of K.C.
Last edited by 56picup; 12/13/2008 10:40 PM.
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Great, that's a start. What is the OD ratio for your current transmission? From what I can find a 700R4 has an OD ratio of 0.70 to 1, is this right?
If you were to run the 700R4 with your current rear and tires you would turn 1,840 rpm at 65 mph. do you have an idea of what rpm you want to turn at what road speed?
Grigg | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I have a 700r4 behind a 350 in a K2500. It has 3.42 gears if I remember correctly, and I notice it shifts down into direct a lot on almost any little incline.
Its my most frequent alternate commuter over another 350 with 3.08 gears that makes the same trip in overdrive (manual so I control what its doing) and never seems to strain unless ol' lead foot decides to pass. The one with 3.08 gears weighs about 1,000 pounds less than the K2500.
My 270 powered GMC Suburban with 3.08 gears and no overdrive makes the same trip at similiar speeds with no strain (but no passing), and I suspect would behave similiar to the K2500 if it had a 700r4 instead of a SM420, dropping in and out of OD as it needed.
My point is that the 700r4 would give you the benefits of overdrive while dropping into direct or lower when conditions made it appropriate. Unless you are carrying heavy loads or pulling a trailer I'd assume the existing gears will be fine until experience tells you otherwise. With a 12-bolt already in place you are probably going to change the gears rather than the axle, so changing later won't mean changing anything you did during the trans swap.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,031 | here is a trippy engine- axle- speed- gear box CALCULATOR. http://vexer.com/68rt/speed.html
Last edited by carolines truck; 12/14/2008 6:37 AM.
Jim & Caroline The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense." Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 275 | You really have to try a couple different gearsets yourself to tell for sure. Some guys like to wind out a motor, others like it to chug along. I run a MY6 trans with 0.73 OD top gear & a 3.08 axle behind my 292. Depends on terrain, what speed you run mostly at, whole bunch of variables. I'd start with around a 3.2 to a 3.5 axle set & go from there. Doug | | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 | My son, the engineer, came up with the following (all with 225 70R15 tires):
Current 3 spd/OD 3.31:
1st 2.8 2nd 1.68 3rd 1.00 OD 0.70
60mph OD 1701rpm 65mph OD 1843rpm 70mph OD 1945rpm 75mph OD 2127rpm
700r4 1st 3.06 2nd 1.62 3rd 1.00 4th 0.70
with 3.73 60mph 4th 1918rpm 65mph 4th 2077rpm 70mph 4th 2237rpm 75mph 4th 2397rpm
with 3.90 60mph 4th 2005rpm 65mph 4th 2172rpm 70mph 4th 2339rpm 75mph 4th 2506rpm
On trips to shows we typically travel at 65 to 70 mph and am currently almost to the floor at times.
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | On trips to shows we typically travel at 65 to 70 mph and am currently almost to the floor at times. On the floor at about 1,900 rpm will it accelerate? If not you probably need lower gears, that's a pretty low cruising RPM. 2,500 rpm at 75, your last combination, sounds about right. You'll also get better fuel mileage with it geared right. You don't want to lug the engine. When you put your foot down it should accelerate, if it does not you either have it geared to fast, or you just plain ran out of power for the speed you're traveling. What's your best guess on gear ratios considering how it drives now, and how you want it to drive? Grigg | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | If you don't like the way it performs now with the .70 OD the 700r4 will only make it better if it downshifts to accelerate or climb a hill. Otherwise you're looking at similar and apparently not inspiring performance.
Based on the way my factory stock truck with a 700r4 behaves I think that's a reasonable approach. If its not going to be acceptable for an automatic to downshift you better change those rear gears.
Provided the motor is running efficiently at your current cruising speed, I'm inclined to stick by my earlier suggestion of installing the trans and only changing the gears after seeing how it feels. You may still end up changing the gears, but if you like it without changing them you've saved time and trouble, not to mention a few dollars.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 275 | Grigg
Thanks for the comebacks. At 1900 rpm won't accelerate or have enough guts or vacuum pressure to hold the cruise control at speed. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Sounds like currently you have a bit to high of a gear. Steve has an excellent point that the transmission will shift for you. That changes things slightly  Theoretically could gear it faster than if you had a manual, and let it shift when needed If a manual with same gears you probably wouldn't shift as much as needed to keep the engine happy and running efficiently. But even so you want that high gear to be usable most of the time, so if on the straight and level you currently can't accelerate in high gear, then even with an automatic you probably need lower gears. Assuming you have the power for the speed you want given the shape and weight of vehicle, which I think you should, then do as Steve suggest and let it run in OD most of the time, but downshift on the big hills. Once you get it setup if you find it doesn't need to downshift for much then you need faster gears and will probably find some more fuel mileage. If it always downshifts and can't hold high gear then you need slower gears and again will find some fuel mileage. Can you play with your different ratio choices before you take the jump by temporally swapping rear wheels and tires (smaller ones) to change the effective ratio? calculate here: http://www.onlineconversion.com/bigger_tires.htmGrigg | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I like the idea of swapping tires to experiement with different ratios. That might be a good cheap way to sort it out if you can find a variety of tires (mounted on wheels) that you can borrow.
Consider the transmission specs on a recent 6-speed Corvette. 5th and 6th are both overdrive gears with 5th being about .7 and 6th about .5. In that evnironment (I beleive) you rarely use 6th unless you're running highway speed and expect to stay there.
But when it is appropriate you can cruise with the motor turning real slow. While it is just a 700r4, my K2500 implements a similar concept, without requiring me to think about what the motor is doing. I'd be happy to try a 6-speed Corvette but haven't had a chance...
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
| |