Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Otto Skorzeny, 68ironhead, 3B, Jon G, Gdads51, NJC, 2 invisible),
104
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,130 Posts1,056,369 Members48,441 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#45629 03/10/2004 4:19 AM | Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 272 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 272 | Hello, I just bought my CPP Master cylinder/booster. It is mounted and I am looking for the best pattern to run the brake lines.
How did those of you with this set up do it? Does it matter a whole lot?
I was thinking
Master cylinder to the front driverside. Add a T over to the passenger side attached to the radiator zmember T down to the back Hose to rear axle T from hose to both sides? | | |
#45630 03/10/2004 4:07 PM | Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 379 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 379 | I think you have one too many T's. Remember this is now a split system. Figure out which port is for the front and back, then route lines to a tee at the front for both sides, and back to the tee at the axle. I would use a pair of residual pressure check valves too 10# for drums, 2# for disc. Not sure if you got a proportioning valve from the vendor, but it's a good idea to put an adjustable one on the line to the rear axle. | | |
#45631 03/10/2004 11:06 PM | Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 272 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 272 | Your right I did not hink about it being a separate set of lines front and back.
Here is the next question. My understanding is that the larger port toward the back is for the drum brakes and the smaller port on the side is for the front disc.
Logic: Smaller line = higher pressure for the discs
Is this correct? | | |
#45632 03/10/2004 11:14 PM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | Nope. The larger port is for the disks. Less pressure than drums but much more volume. Usually the reservoir toward the firewall is for the front brakes and the front reservoir is for the rear brakes.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#45633 03/10/2004 11:23 PM | Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,442 Moderator - The Electrical Bay | | Moderator - The Electrical Bay Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,442 | I copied the brake system out of a 76 Chevy Pickup with front disks/rear drums no power steering... except my front disks are out of an early 80's Camaro... I bought new parts and fabbed my brake lines to fit my frame.
Another quality post. Real Trucks Rattle HELP! The Paranoids are after me!
| | |
#45634 03/11/2004 1:16 AM | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 115 Member | | Member Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 115 | 4otF said:
Nope. The larger port is for the disks. Less pressure than drums but much more volume. Usually the reservoir toward the firewall is for the front brakes and the front reservoir is for the rear brakes.
Hah. You guys are trying to be logical, and the factory engineers obviously didn't care about logic. I have a big pile of cylinder cores from the major manufacturers, and 10 years experience looking at other people's cylinders. I've never been able to detect a pattern. Some have the large reservoir to the front, some to the rear. Some have the large port to the front, some to the rear. Some have the large port at the same end as the large reservoir, some the other way. One GM cylinder in my bonepile, probably from a late '70s-early '80s 1/2 ton, has the proportioning valve still plumbed up to it. The small port has a 1/4" line and the large port, which in this cylinder is for the front discs, has a 3/16" line. So...in my experience, which is considerable, you can't draw any meaningful conclusions from the port sizes or the line sizes.
If it's a correct disc/drum master, the fluid reservoirs will be of different sizes. Large reservoir for the disc brakes, small reservoir for the drum brakes, and you can take that to the bank.
Note that with rare exception the pressure is the same for front and rear because the primary and secondary master cylinder pistons are the same size. The only way to get different pressures out of the master is to make the pistons different sizes. A few mid '60s to early '70s American vehicles had stepped master cylinders, mainly Ramblers and IH Scouts, but most stepped cylinders are made by Girling and are in foreign cars.
Disc caliper pistons are much larger than wheel cylinder pistons, but the pads stay quite close to the disc when the brakes aren't applied--so close that disc brakes run much hotter than drum brakes. This means that the volume required for activation of disc calipers and drum cylinders differs so slightly as to be insignificant, certainly not by enough to require larger lines or ports for disc brakes. The reason the disc reservoir is larger is that the disc brakes self-adjust by displacement of the piston as the pads wear, thus increasing the volume behind the piston, and the reservoir is supposed to contain enough fluid to last the life of the pads even if it is never refilled. So the additional volume is needed over the life of the pads, not at each application of the brakes.
Joe | | |
| |