| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Hotrod Lincoln, Gdads51, Bill Hanlon, JoeDude, frogfarmer, tclederman, gswbbc, dt235sd),
85
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,038 Posts1,055,536 Members48,425 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 238 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 238 |  OK - I'm new to the old truck stuff but HOW did they measure the wheelbase of trucks in the '50s ? Measured my '52 GMC 303-24 which the manual says is 161"s . I measured 222"s +/- from the front of the front tire to rear of the rear tire . 147"s +/- rear of front tire to front of rear tire . And 185"s +/- center of front axle to center of rear axle . Any guesses as to what in the heck is going on ?  Thanks - Ed a new guy | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: May 2001 Posts: 7,438 | Many big trucks were extended to fit whatever specialty bed was installed on it. Wheel base is axle to axle. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 238 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 238 | Thanks ! I had always thought it was axle to axle but when my beasty did not fit the specks I was not sure if the old trucks were measured the same . Just another of my ol' trucks querks . ED | | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | If you measured correctly then it is 185". C/L to C/L. | | |
|
|
| |
