Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (baldeagle, Hush, mick53, Southerntruck, SmalltownTRKGuy, Hotrod Lincoln, Gray_Ghost),
102
guests, and
15
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,077 Posts1,056,033 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 | Has anyone tried putting a 50, 3100 cab and bed on a 81 halfton C/K frame. There is about 15" diff in wheelbase. Thinking of putting tool box between cab and bed to fill in the space. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 | Seems like a lot of work to swap in a frame with too long a wheel base as well as too wide a track width. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | What's wrong with your frame? If a IFS is Your goal, welding in a clip would be easier.
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 | My frame is fine, but will need to make a complete swap of IFS, motor, tranny and rear end, can't decide which way would be less work. Know track width will require offset wheels, but with them all way round shouldn't be too bad. Rear end is a 3.?? haven't checked it for sure, want a good MPG. The 81 drives and rides like a caddy!!! | | | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 | Had some thoughs of just shortening the frame, on C/K, as that isn't too big a deal. Could use offset wheels all way round. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | I've never swapped frames but it must be more difficult than just backspacing wheels. You will have cab mount issues. Then you'll have to deal with your front sheetmetal, grill and etc. Your bed won't fit the frame either. A lot of extra work. You will probably save a few bucks but you'll spend that on a divorce. Everyone sees things differently, but from my frame of reference I would put a 10 or 12 bolt GM rear with open drive and a Mustang II IFS. Just my 2 cents...
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 37 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 37 | I agree with Big Chevy. I put my 57 3/4ton on a 81 4x4 frame. I had to shorten the frame 8.5", butt weld it, and fabricate and weld gussetts to each side of the frame. I also had to fabricate body mounts, and Core support mounts. It was a lot of put-on, and take-off, to get it right. Without the right equipment, taking the cab on and off exposes it to damage. The outcome was beautiful, but a lot of work. The only reason I did it was because I wanted a modern 4x4 and there's no aftermarket "kit" way of doing that. With all of the companies catering to AD trucks, both resto and aftermarket, I would definitly go the IFS and Open rear route with a 2wd. Just my $0.02.
1949 Studebaker 2R16A 1961 Chevrolet Impala 1968 Chevrolet Corvette Roadster 1971 C10 | | | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 5 | Thanks for all the info, at the moment, I am leaning toward, just using the IFS, 350/350 and trade for a rearend that will fit. Can buy crossmembers, etc, readily available. I don't have much room in garage, and lifting the cab would be a huge deal. Keep up the good work, thanks for the input. | | |
| |